From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD6C433EF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231829AbiCCXF4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 18:05:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231553AbiCCXFz (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 18:05:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D03B1A398 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 15:05:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id s1so6112918plg.12 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:05:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :references; bh=0rjVTAY/+PvZWNu9kV2z7bYdz12qsHvcveThNMhsXpI=; b=bB2HiSm8ycJnX4vwi0u6SG8Dt7gi8xKl5hEXDa2/m9Ozw54f6EbvyJO1qZf6Eqj01/ 3UfGdrIjm5B9rlreYWNkKXyontvN0frSm5N1SSvdZf3iOT+1vnWazGgkzU/ZMFxrsv1K Saebp0WzKUdPpajTXv9oNHXswVYqZ+hV7DMoVcoLy8YECfSbQkmaN4JMfpjEjs8Utct0 pGjMzH4V+zYjNUT6e/lN+H6o2HzOGhn6PuaPhU2TWU8wpLC+6mS7Z+y5HsfmzCAujoLi xo5w60EAJ7g0mdh0bRuCJ3qYLgEwq8xHCUsNJhTpfDqrXK1Pmkq98hn5tF0T4Xu67q57 kXxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject :reply-to:in-reply-to:references; bh=0rjVTAY/+PvZWNu9kV2z7bYdz12qsHvcveThNMhsXpI=; b=N1Ga/L4bLiJpmz0QtA1F3ZyQX3k3CGpNYUpnah8I1V/11Auhbhw4MA+iKf5oqr7iS1 fs3tpQ/EAB328SQYBfWuweJ4U5JrOn7T+IGX8UP8FAynwfcJxr0Fvf/AZwhuqx7lQrkg /suBOxRakyrw4g22Z1wy//nWLcOmsoqB4Hi5FUHQXL4tgX5VZrOOxWogsAGOUg0q3opm bO51QFXrAH7OZIsWWCAuT8CKEXmVXbLqFbKnyBrYCz9uCjfH8u+CmPbzHfbZuvdcFZI3 54oMh0UZNRpqqg5xKGnOjC2g2r1mWkTu2gTcEGbdZnQWAi4coJ6xMlUmniDZO/5alvZf RbaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308YNvttN2gRnZb/ptbdCTcGuPmEnLwWuBwsK++z+vDaArzhlj8 Ykj1URaK6g8agW9qz/KCliqcZbdTAyM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDPTCNsr5w/xKaa3VWN1muNJ7NpAI2RZH59MdfZL3+2+j7PgkTwjLiOb8lQKYr0MwoDUbqQw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b10:b0:1be:f727:806b with SMTP id lx16-20020a17090b4b1000b001bef727806bmr7728248pjb.18.1646348708516; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([20.118.164.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10-20020a056a00148a00b004e0f420dd90sm3837356pfu.40.2022.03.03.15.05.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:05:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <622149a4.1c69fb81.627fb.a1da@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:05:08 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8825846669454872176==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com Subject: RE: [1/3] Bluetooth: btusb: Make use of of BIT macro to declare flags Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220303221709.387865-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> References: <20220303221709.387865-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============8825846669454872176== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=620130 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 2.97 seconds GitLint PASS 1.62 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 1.26 seconds BuildKernel PASS 35.42 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 26.94 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 72.59 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 479.12 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 13.62 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 6.17 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 104.98 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester FAIL 7.53 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 7.74 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 7.62 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 6.40 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 7.53 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success Failed 0.153 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============8825846669454872176==--