public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com
Subject: RE: hci_event: handling CIS QoS
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:05:53 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <637712b1.620a0220.28145.3c35@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116143334.4990-1-abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5139 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=696036

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      0.55 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.23 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.50 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      38.42 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      34.97 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      486.31 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      17.60 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         FAIL      17.97 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      6.05 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        PASS      116.88 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      10.35 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      9.81 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      11.29 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      7.82 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      9.72 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      6.52 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      36.32 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL
Desc: Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
Output:
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
##############################
Test: TestRunner_iso-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run iso-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 55, Passed: 11 (20.0%), Failed: 44, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
ISO QoS 8_1_1 - Success                              Failed       2.011 seconds
ISO QoS 8_2_1 - Success                              Failed       0.181 seconds
ISO QoS 16_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 CIG 0x01 - Success                    Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 CIG 0x01 CIS 0x01 - Success           Failed       0.173 seconds
ISO QoS 24_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.176 seconds
ISO QoS 24_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 32_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 32_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 44_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 44_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 48_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 48_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.160 seconds
ISO QoS 48_3_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 48_4_1 - Success                             Failed       0.164 seconds
ISO QoS 48_5_1 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 48_6_1 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 8_1_2 - Success                              Failed       0.162 seconds
ISO QoS 8_2_2 - Success                              Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 16_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.163 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO QoS 24_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.175 seconds
ISO QoS 24_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 32_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 32_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.173 seconds
ISO QoS 44_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 44_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 48_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.175 seconds
ISO QoS 48_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 48_3_2 - Success                             Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 48_4_2 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 48_5_2 - Success                             Failed       0.164 seconds
ISO QoS 48_6_2 - Success                             Failed       0.161 seconds
ISO Connect2 CIG 0x01 - Success                      Failed       0.215 seconds
ISO Send - Success                                   Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO Receive - Success                                Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO Defer Send - Success                             Failed       0.170 seconds
ISO 48_2_1 Defer Send - Success                      Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO Defer Receive - Success                          Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO 48_2_1 Defer Receive - Success                   Failed       0.163 seconds
ISO Send and Receive - Success                       Failed       0.184 seconds
ISO Disconnect - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO Reconnect - Success                              Failed       0.168 seconds


---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 14:33 [PATCH] hci_event: handling CIS QoS Abhay Maheta
2022-11-16 15:03 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-16 21:28   ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2022-11-16 15:27 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2022-11-16 23:01 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-18  4:15 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  5:05 ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2022-11-18  5:56 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  7:07 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  7:54 ` bluez.test.bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=637712b1.620a0220.28145.3c35@mx.google.com \
    --to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
    --cc=abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox