From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com [209.85.217.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251D91F91D6 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 20:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.217.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775764917; cv=none; b=iFO0YB5V4KpuhVixOBnCDaU9LodBJN3NI5aLbSAeoEXMuftcGgXWCs5OWEfPpa9FIREPXQw5D/jNaOYxJJuCN9KPTm++gi9kHiG/Z5Er+y5QIoA9hiEtO35OiJRoXRjz9SlwZRDXz5SgxQJGoVSi0erEhpDYKOIl0jYkoXlL6mw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775764917; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+bQ08B/ntrHvfsYdJh54mu67d4jRYuY9egyJP8yYv3E=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=ne5eKRTi9wtRhbfyjhKtM2YxRR4KPpTyOf5q/s+i9NzF1SKDmmu+oCbmlIzTZGfpiGaTdlV69JNLG9iNvV2ctnmKUVH6ISd7FmPavTKsTrQrPQZeyFyatL41EQ3cP+dJihyRwG060tkigaJw/KmDocIyjovp9beqUIORoACGTBo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=i7dAJEvM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.217.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="i7dAJEvM" Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5ff05af29b4so432719137.1 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:01:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775764915; x=1776369715; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G3t6t0seRb5X4VcLfYkvvZ9tpBUmXRFtzkvhwCMaTO8=; b=i7dAJEvMukkl5K3sxykfLi5xQtVBUVVMw/gTJEkvmQaG3hRlX5vWBDZXz9mbondgEw SNjNGk8oEZsUgBpzcYhRO0wap1bVpubd2yJgr7rEbIkfNl3MPgVb8ik9kssGM3lIb4ju LD7S9553o3eaaHU1siIRWf731gWz6tern6Zs9r40W3UQNqRMoub8dBMm5KBH77Ckt+PH F17FhVTKx2i78SbHafPAQJ/ORhJyxYZHyaRPJwG+7PZ1HronmjMu9YUAlIJADVmdH9Pc 5V8a6JQH/D/TXfz3nNg3sbeMaYsItT2ntLqsicrD0Q8sFUZGE1kOIRicZToQ7gu4qLaJ 3XRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775764915; x=1776369715; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G3t6t0seRb5X4VcLfYkvvZ9tpBUmXRFtzkvhwCMaTO8=; b=cdo1BiPa5H8Q0UjqnwdzA4iZLuInoHz48uL0y918iwPK9rEZBpdCg9yJyNckhPmrg2 4RCD2EL7C5kQMVs9tdDxmswP8DaUke+wkkS1zR3IXkGKN1a+2tejSap8ZUQ9Y7q/trdY 11AC0QHrTo6h+f+9WmKvDhihXeHU5EfGPmv9xLRO9zaVK44mVxxB1qXHeYlb8O8V3OTp 0oOCN2SEa0X61TuGaN3W9Mg2/6IP/oi5G+oQOhY6H+9zBNk16ijJPhAEBk/YE37DDeKx QH8a8BocKJMIEsFjVaqn2DSzOlIzdfWs/dRApazVdR49tfR8DigJIXis3mZilkRrEskR A6cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwP72zUZ//Rv+yIpvGvIDDKlvGHN5mwno4l1Hp4uZsHmI1aC7VN p6D6wjOx5jjAYO85kWDMQ3ppWDNTdKvflwjN34sI3hKmFdktF0aUG4QRa4wIxg== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiev5zx1QCXopKjGUTUNcbAuqNaIrKUElDhpL/UBioqPlX4IFLWytD+/TDNZEvjn ZnVxjVNmQgA7s0aWTXzBL8r0NpWz2vziCjAI9BgVnSfDE1hFQcMpD8FuHFsDevfTR/c3irjOjAL nQVP10L26830YWzlybS9LJxuekn4rUo2pnCNTpSk/VZ+i2k05wU9Pvnae6379ZKLyyE4nA7PwBG H8wO1kN3UQsU1Pny/d3Jwnuro1dv4E2jcQG1lSgcWOuYZWmtkR5NqqjzD0/ion+Q5v9KC4kUbf2 qztbyANIi/oGY83DjqgST+FsvAfjZ4RkbZqvPTWS+4+wpfVr26XJcfnKJZlMBTWKdU7hwiEubVk jcU24KmwfekhAFIWXvAVOLpTFiKoNbjFqceMxxqfkfIBcthGn6d/20dlTkpBNON2q0SDyzk7FoW Ug73/0SMCPN5E77WinXAtVwdP9pJkd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:4a89:b0:604:eeb5:5b38 with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-60a00b36d56mr169962137.22.1775764914578; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([20.49.14.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-8ac8449e664sm4533726d6.0.2026.04.09.13.01.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69d805b2.d40a0220.88c29.5ffd@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0206411794152649178==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, imv4bel@gmail.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: SCO: Fix use-after-free in sco_conn_ready() due to missing sock_hold In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============0206411794152649178== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1069343 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.32 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.30 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds BuildKernel PASS 26.01 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 28.81 seconds CheckSparse PASS 27.17 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 25.04 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 563.89 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 27.83 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 33.50 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.57 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 112.66 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 12.17 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.41 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.21 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 11.75 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.62 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.77 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.93 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.25 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.103 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g5a33dbd55f1e #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001dbe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x3e2/0xa70 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880025ff220 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x235/0xa70 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x3e2/0xa70 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g5a33dbd55f1e #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x3e2/0xa70 sco_connect_cfm+0x3e2/0xa70 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 1.835 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.995 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g5a33dbd55f1e #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888002767140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa444d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/23/checks --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============0206411794152649178==--