* [RFC PATCH 0/1] Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup()
@ 2026-03-24 10:34 Alberto Garcia
2026-03-24 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Alberto Garcia
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Garcia @ 2026-03-24 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
Cc: Alberto Garcia, Marcel Holtmann, Luiz Augusto von Dentz,
Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Hello,
I've been having problems with the btmtk bluetooth driver for a long
time. What happens is a failure during initialization and the loading
of the firmware, with errors like these:
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to get device id (-108)
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to get fw version (-108)
The device is MediaTek MT7921 (0489:e0cd), there are more details in
this bug report:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217475
Passing btusb.enable_autosuspend=n seems to solve the problem for me.
My computer's hard drive is encrypted so it can take a long time
before the bluetooth firmware is loaded, so I interpret that this
causes the device to autosuspend during boot and that's why
initialization fails. Does that make sense?
I saw that commit 67dba2c28fe0 fixed similar errors during shutdown by
using usb_autopm_get_interface() so I tried the same approach for the
btusb_mtk_setup() function. I confirm that this solves the problem for
me and with this patch the bluetooth adapter works reliably.
I was also suggested to try the simpler approach of using setup_on_usb
instead:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_MTK) &&
(id->driver_info & BTUSB_MEDIATEK)) {
- hdev->setup = btusb_mtk_setup;
+ data->setup_on_usb = btusb_mtk_setup;
hdev->shutdown = btusb_mtk_shutdown;
hdev->manufacturer = 70;
However this does not solve the problem:
kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: HW/SW Version: 0x008a008a, Build Time: 20241106151414
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Execution of wmt command timed out
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to send wmt patch dwnld (-110)
kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to set up firmware (-110)
So I would like to know if a patch like the one I'm sending is a good
approach or if I should try something else.
Regards,
Berto
Alberto Garcia (1):
Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup()
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/1] Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup()
2026-03-24 10:34 [RFC PATCH 0/1] Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup() Alberto Garcia
@ 2026-03-24 10:34 ` Alberto Garcia
2026-03-24 11:06 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-09 20:02 ` bluez.test.bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Garcia @ 2026-03-24 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
Cc: Alberto Garcia, Marcel Holtmann, Luiz Augusto von Dentz,
Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
btmtk_usb_setup() accesses the device without first ensuring that it
is awake, so it may fail if the device has been autosuspended, e.g.:
Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to get device id (-108)
Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to get fw version (-108)
Add usb_autopm_get_interface()/usb_autopm_put_interface() around the
entire setup process, mirroring what commit 67dba2c28fe0 ("Bluetooth:
btmtk: Fix failed to send func ctrl for MediaTek devices.") already
did for btmtk_usb_shutdown().
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217475
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
index fa7533578f85..a5d15efa8712 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int btmtk_usb_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_usb_suspend);
-int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
+static int do_btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
{
struct btmtk_data *btmtk_data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
struct btmtk_hci_wmt_params wmt_params;
@@ -1453,6 +1453,21 @@ int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
return 0;
}
+
+int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
+{
+ struct btmtk_data *btmtk_data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
+ int err;
+
+ err = usb_autopm_get_interface(btmtk_data->intf);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ err = do_btmtk_usb_setup(hdev);
+
+ usb_autopm_put_interface(btmtk_data->intf);
+ return err;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_usb_setup);
int btmtk_usb_shutdown(struct hci_dev *hdev)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup()
2026-03-24 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Alberto Garcia
@ 2026-03-24 11:06 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-09 20:02 ` bluez.test.bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bluez.test.bot @ 2026-03-24 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth, berto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2833 bytes --]
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1071561
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.44 seconds
GitLint PENDING 0.25 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.11 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 26.35 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 28.76 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 27.75 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 25.28 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 562.72 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 27.55 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester FAIL 38.48 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.23 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 114.01 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.83 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.12 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.23 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 11.48 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.44 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.52 seconds
IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.83 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_iso-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run iso-tester with test-runner
Output:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in le_read_features_complete+0x7e/0x2b0
Total: 141, Passed: 141 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.103 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 1.908 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 2.006 seconds
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series
Output:
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup()
2026-03-24 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Alberto Garcia
2026-03-24 11:06 ` bluez.test.bot
@ 2026-04-09 20:02 ` bluez.test.bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bluez.test.bot @ 2026-04-09 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth, berto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6877 bytes --]
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1071561
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.35 seconds
GitLint PENDING 0.27 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.13 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 26.15 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 28.43 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 27.09 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 25.51 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 567.84 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 28.15 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 57.33 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.37 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 114.44 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.48 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.43 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.34 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.52 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.74 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.71 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.71 seconds
IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.32 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.112 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-ged17c54eba28 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880025fe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888002141c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280
__sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260
__x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c
-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70
__lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0
sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-ged17c54eba28 #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60
__might_resched+0x2ea/0x500
lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0
? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210
? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10
? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10
? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110
? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x368/0x490
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50
? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60
...
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.762 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.995 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-ged17c54eba28 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888002760140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8b64d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30
chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00
l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920
l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0
hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30
-> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980
lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660
full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190
vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60
ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c
-> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
...
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series
Output:
https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/31/checks
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-09 20:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-24 10:34 [RFC PATCH 0/1] Bluetooth: btmtk: add USB autopm support to btmtk_usb_setup() Alberto Garcia
2026-03-24 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Alberto Garcia
2026-03-24 11:06 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-09 20:02 ` bluez.test.bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox