From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dl1-f54.google.com (mail-dl1-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56EC71AAE28 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 20:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775765008; cv=none; b=sT1xwgeiwB7JUJK0E5zhQ2HvpioL9K6Y+dbs2wpXUiEQmzxdvq/eUS/ORadT32HmItn8kARB2Bb1r21MKFfFv6h3laaTk8tzffbjfwrrzqXrc9md5X1y14KblqhJTPF6ETjC3bj3HPAL+IZNI5wwTnS71U/XTbrQ6thrkTh9kME= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775765008; c=relaxed/simple; bh=woDYFrjW7wIq/EYIZDmQ5Pgj8cVvVa8zoYj/TvxUOdk=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=doe/FMpG7q1iWtWRLTev+vTDnlBV71b6byLLnRFyJEcQMlr9pbK/2zY+GEVATCx7eeC9hw37lvSQidjdvkbIw9eyRwYxbUGSY9ceF/nV/v9AlxdDryrDWUwloHgtHDPXRV+ThF11gaHcJ0z0d+EHi0BHQpgYmu/ezmy96/Yhx1c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=OaB82goo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OaB82goo" Received: by mail-dl1-f54.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-12c20010f10so3148355c88.0 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775765006; x=1776369806; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pXoDgXixCRzkK4tZ81tCm4AwfeJfsw15ycm8VaF7vaA=; b=OaB82goovwg4CIkorB1/ujDapwhX17uCUkTzhEF3v3kQSQBegpgeH4Wg+twIZ9dejt MMwoDvJCgxUWYiWUwZDGdAv/20AWHEkpBuw+2wEZ0kQ/GmNDmSSaepCEIz4EgjyaJpr+ YCwsRXTqk+b2cV1uJbnVXDCWGxN/kdJM6Vslbng8rU4KA5c3GgPpDn+kxkFbHUL/Qvdi 7tpPi0vrH7Bp3RjSzON+PDJiRcB5iKhmN+/K8CPzencl89LRT84zxHPLtA2UlxgVzxbW kkRxi+lD8FQxVJJddDhUcVLj09rQnXGkfgiqLe9BsxhFWpfKiy5TTQsu/m62crBZN6ie v3aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775765006; x=1776369806; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pXoDgXixCRzkK4tZ81tCm4AwfeJfsw15ycm8VaF7vaA=; b=I3vJBDvgpguhG1AwZq+Q1gCahIsHgnBEg1JS5xntOHIwlLqeJG6bTZFjNUhG6anXLZ qL3lyh8TLi+QSMMVZNp/oWBdj9hQ6dO4lzoHp7XNGUBguk++OO+YNIJZyZGCw9DjQqFa ROHQc/2/23WfaCLxD+ZGzGEuVD2MCNndEdbSwQ96iZGz43YrLK8bJUeXsqVXIe4Kq4SA gtSMGsOBYkfjqtcajJywD8vHm+E97rI6440/rKbDSqO0U7hClwqIWc5wLUsKAmNapJiG OKI1Viic5dgriP/1KtZgqKlcW2bvymcYLs5OA4nK7wy1aEn/mnlE+feIQ3j6Km6LD0aA V9sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEkHufzq1L5xS5mY1/9cPB3zh97zveCjpkAUf25j8O3aeJqw+D 4GFqMkecGZJQiaXu8RRZM3C5rH2AwxiN36SSHoGddAkS/Ag7w6XGzfVVhENkIg== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesxS6emwntvn3K3vKUkw17bO9mtmr/8FJ6FhL/2/JEt7Te9W1eF6iNwdyl90xD oZu4O1GigTCsgcrxWLAcXOiNwPq72VFjPavG6lnFiCd2yZ4A0T+5n/ROv/iLctJyBVnGzOO79Yn v6fZ4NyehtvD0tNQBmgFotM/6ZiVBMpGUrfGu/U6E9fsjXHTJWTj8vDhW215Axszm5MmaULH9tc atkwQTIiOQj8JgX8xVEXUgQ2h6JrnEU/igp0uExsJyjkEMN9Ie2hfCz6PUHbABbU3JrtHg2wpqD tEMjYqJ5mKPMH8WKKeYA7rAVHVima+Y63dZKRQDg9vzToeKPZF5EiENxIqaXuswf1x2GozvzrJd eGKD0x4SRwpKIPH031wdrX0TWbhcgnrPOhiprHV5PRZcGW/KM9DkxZR0fgxzd5HdIVFrojk4THM TFEgV/4omd3ZO0AgboYJHaNkPnDC0r X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:d70e:b0:2c5:3b87:2fec with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2d58ac80366mr281730eec.31.1775765005878; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([20.189.186.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2d55f5c69casm1388621eec.2.2026.04.09.13.03.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69d8060d.050a0220.53cf0.6c85@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3464046568826697859==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, xiaoguai0992@gmail.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: ISO: validate ISO_END fragments In-Reply-To: <20260328200938.140528-1-xiaoguai0992@gmail.com> References: <20260328200938.140528-1-xiaoguai0992@gmail.com> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============3464046568826697859== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1074052 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.53 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.44 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.06 seconds BuildKernel PASS 27.12 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 29.57 seconds CheckSparse PASS 28.25 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 26.17 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 586.43 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 28.52 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 36.86 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.44 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 117.45 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.69 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.83 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.47 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.56 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.83 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.71 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.83 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.35 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.117 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-ga495e056aeee #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001945240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880025f6220 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-ga495e056aeee #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.668 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.996 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-ga495e056aeee #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/10 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888002476940 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa5e4d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/35/checks --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============3464046568826697859==--