From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dl1-f42.google.com (mail-dl1-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF43279DA6 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775765057; cv=none; b=kt+BJlDZzEukhW8t3fF1FVY4+PwjIlO8nw7YPHVn8+ts4gZrgavHsWYlMjhnfLQ5I13mkirTxshWVz0B0MnKziMS/lB/B4Dq54UirymvhI+6OUGTxPaJuV75sfkwEX0dbEWmV0MxIg/SIcNlNViGa/aVH/150Y5qtgta2J+zLfs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775765057; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XKc2lCD+MiQ+joWkn+wQtIaBlvEYPJ8ANwbEO6tOX8c=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=BIUKE5QnUl7O4Y7NKLquJ7yOicYrwMqf/+ONwwq/WTXFzlunGFMv3Xvk8N4DuYsJRrMbnE7EE08yscWihP/9dWJyVk3hPS58lbD/ggl0nhFcLU2/LP12OKJaZoSd7jBxy2GwexJHQmu/l7nXYxjrnBa5yV/U7Dvp1ZPep8QQNrs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=NW4wZgMX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="NW4wZgMX" Received: by mail-dl1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-12c080efc1eso707259c88.0 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775765054; x=1776369854; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SSu59tAA0UEscYk/BFsVp3H79kDdLbYMwDyYPuSbwaE=; b=NW4wZgMXzMVq6DS1IkGm9QIPHZGmesHwe4AMagYLsLfhiwZM+faTPT0GI/POlyZTDy L8KB8WXq4Sk96kFmwamsYCa2KVztifxzfdzrvAU2e1B4tIgZvadHW1rTb0zyS9Ne6rHm guLEsBKGfAHcJBehu4BxWg2/syV0MvSXwAVmnRPK7zHLidaoIWUyR/2dkhAzt7jtw38M bJ29s5QDl1Ei1A9sG0Durd0bP2n4Z4/tYFHmUpIXVCru8GDDQm2m32Rk7RDyAgZ4crgH 3AwMo8ugNaP8BzLuZ0yFVp/XU1vLUkKklWHRNfF1BYBjPz+AtkrZnoRqt2+rY5+JgdXM cmGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775765054; x=1776369854; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SSu59tAA0UEscYk/BFsVp3H79kDdLbYMwDyYPuSbwaE=; b=ClpXYXlSpwt9qs3dq66dgtpFyCyBKx9GtjALrdq16Fk7UBFxZjVqdXkFUT8meTxYy8 1LxbSh3cQsjY8RbaENjB92p90/9QhrJPnKreiZQPgADG4C/W+oPP1uCam6RgFLzkC8UU ak4HuBG6hspxXnebu8rbpkHKUOF+91J4wA1oDE7sllHr3p2DsKkwhTO1mREqwxn+lAZh hB4f46hl1XKOhDNCmq0hNx1MushqtetLJeD2W6vzed1MTMoHCzjhExisXVf1oAojmz0Y ZUQh7N3sVv9isyJkj43nk/OXujWZK6ETF3GCHOrdSCB4Zk/ejjGcOTed4aSF1+xY97E7 +BFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+EwcJK9Mmih6fUTOmVjtCw8eUGVFzyOLMBAJrrcH0m4+fqIT9 zT3s92peIdsyFcc+AAwG3d+9NHBnid7e8Zxfz4uMrlkPjGM/DVMbCTugAkYM+g== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievl0tJNV3z0ARElBIF9P5t3uhnlMO/qjnn3C94qVV/rnI6xU4zAJ7tKUc8pSbj 1iYDMGZ2Y8Xm8EZOkSa7tZnpxn4zBZdGAGCWi5XGloZor3tOpxbej/4/JaV4i8m54L+BxY1JDkx ULeldGFXxZhyc8xwKDlIOP2sho+Nora/Qb5y3OyjqcmkQBkcfzbAJ1lD9gCV5oawHN+LJhJD9z4 vw9QyOW2rlh8FPxwdWOshgkC38fsh/0F5X6HHuTG4WNueDNnHsOagwftZzss3iyqQ+9/1/J69Nw fqj8vYVUPGs1MR44sk141wp4qHpHPqnze9ZGcwJqGGql8C3r3CdPy21FlRzq3KN9wIw6DT0AzSK h4L2swR/ffKYI0ETGoD141sCDXzdQxcAa4BfpDPY3jTvPRJe5u7vVC4LK4fh0VQ8IuLbUfd04I4 BbeEwGBbkXMXDw/EgcUrn3GWBDDGc+sQo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:606:b0:12c:15ce:a71b with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-12c28c6b0d3mr2129569c88.25.1775765054228; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([128.24.161.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-12c3459faa7sm948786c88.2.2026.04.09.13.04.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69d8063d.050a0220.9c980.443c@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6426076960302693972==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, fnkl.kernel@gmail.com Subject: RE: [v2] Bluetooth: Add Broadcom channel priority commands In-Reply-To: <20260407-brcm-prio-v2-1-3f745edf49af@gmail.com> References: <20260407-brcm-prio-v2-1-3f745edf49af@gmail.com> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============6426076960302693972== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1078304 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.56 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.32 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.08 seconds BuildKernel PASS 24.31 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 26.66 seconds CheckSparse PASS 25.54 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 24.24 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 515.24 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 51.34 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 38.77 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.30 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 110.50 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.32 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 16.39 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.16 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 11.70 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.57 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.70 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.62 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.36 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases L2CAP LE Client - Close socket 2 Timed out 23.777 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.105 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-gaa582b6f213c #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025fe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888002141c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-gaa582b6f213c #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 123, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 123 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Tainted: G W 7.0.0-rc2-gaa582b6f213c #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? percpu_rwsem_wait+0x390/0x400 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __schedule+0x7a0/0x1750 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_release+0x39/0x260 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 1.977 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.990 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-gaa582b6f213c #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880026e0940 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffbd84d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/52/checks --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============6426076960302693972==--