public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, johan@kernel.org
Subject: RE: Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup irq devres lifetime
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:20:37 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69d80a15.050a0220.2644b7.157d@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402154810.2467291-2-johan@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5714 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1076527

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PENDING   0.53 seconds
GitLint                       PENDING   0.47 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.31 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      26.79 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      29.28 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      28.13 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      25.66 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      583.75 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       FAIL      29.76 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      37.40 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      6.60 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        FAIL      121.13 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      9.65 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         FAIL      14.73 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      10.65 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        FAIL      12.64 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      9.99 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      6.94 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester     PASS      9.03 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PENDING   0.39 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:

##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:

##############################
Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
L2CAP BR/EDR Server - Set PHY 3M                     Failed       0.120 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 488 (98.8%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 4

Failed Test Cases
Pairing Acceptor - SMP over BR/EDR 2                 Timed out    2.576 seconds
Read Exp Feature - Success                           Failed       0.116 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-g974015308a27 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888002043240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888002094c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
       _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
       sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280
       __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260
       __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c

-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70
       __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0
       lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
       lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0
       sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
       hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
       hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
       hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
       process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
       worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
       kthread+0x368/0x490
       ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g974015308a27 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60
 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500
 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0
 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210
 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10
 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10
 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10
 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110
 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10
 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0x368/0x490
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50
 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60
...
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1                               Timed out    2.609 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2                               Timed out    1.994 seconds
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series
Output:



https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/43/checks

---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-09 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 15:48 [PATCH v3 0/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup irq devres lifetime Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on registration failure Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 17:13   ` Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup irq devres lifetime bluez.test.bot
2026-04-02 20:56   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on registration failure Paul Menzel
2026-04-09 20:20   ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2026-04-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on marvell probe failure Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup source leak on " Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup irq devres lifetime Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Bluetooth: btusb: clean up probe error handling Johan Hovold
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-02  9:27 [PATCH v2 1/3] Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup source leak on probe failure Johan Hovold
2026-04-02 10:17 ` Bluetooth: btusb: fix wakeup irq devres lifetime bluez.test.bot
2026-03-30  9:33 [PATCH] " Johan Hovold
2026-03-30 10:15 ` bluez.test.bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69d80a15.050a0220.2644b7.157d@mx.google.com \
    --to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox