* [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them
@ 2026-04-03 8:56 Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-04 9:54 ` bluez.test.bot
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pengpeng Hou @ 2026-04-03 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Holtmann, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Cc: linux-bluetooth, linux-kernel, pengpeng
`bnep_rx_frame()` pulls the first byte from the skb and immediately reads
the control type from the remaining data. Short control packets can leave
no bytes in the skb at that point.
The later control-message pull logic also reads `skb->data + 1` before
proving that the length byte or 16-bit filter length is actually present.
Validate the required control-header bytes before each dereference and
drop malformed frames through the existing bad-frame path.
Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
---
net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
index d44987d4515c..0e7a7fb758c9 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
@@ -299,18 +299,27 @@ static int bnep_rx_frame(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct net_device *dev = s->dev;
struct sk_buff *nskb;
- u8 type, ctrl_type;
+ u8 type;
dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
+ if (!skb->len)
+ goto badframe;
+
type = *(u8 *) skb->data;
skb_pull(skb, 1);
- ctrl_type = *(u8 *)skb->data;
if ((type & BNEP_TYPE_MASK) >= sizeof(__bnep_rx_hlen))
goto badframe;
if ((type & BNEP_TYPE_MASK) == BNEP_CONTROL) {
+ u8 ctrl_type;
+
+ if (!skb->len)
+ goto badframe;
+
+ ctrl_type = *(u8 *)skb->data;
+
if (bnep_rx_control(s, skb->data, skb->len) < 0) {
dev->stats.tx_errors++;
kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -326,12 +335,16 @@ static int bnep_rx_frame(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
switch (ctrl_type) {
case BNEP_SETUP_CONN_REQ:
/* Pull: ctrl type (1 b), len (1 b), data (len bytes) */
+ if (skb->len < 2)
+ goto badframe;
if (!skb_pull(skb, 2 + *(u8 *)(skb->data + 1) * 2))
goto badframe;
break;
case BNEP_FILTER_MULTI_ADDR_SET:
case BNEP_FILTER_NET_TYPE_SET:
/* Pull: ctrl type (1 b), len (2 b), data (len bytes) */
+ if (skb->len < 3)
+ goto badframe;
if (!skb_pull(skb, 3 + *(u16 *)(skb->data + 1) * 2))
goto badframe;
break;
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them
2026-04-03 8:56 [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them Pengpeng Hou
@ 2026-04-04 9:54 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-07 16:44 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bluez.test.bot @ 2026-04-04 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth, pengpeng
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2593 bytes --]
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1077246
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.28 seconds
GitLint PENDING 0.22 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.11 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 26.39 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 28.88 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 27.39 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 25.34 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 574.28 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 27.80 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 38.08 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.46 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 114.80 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.41 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.21 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.09 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.42 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.93 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.65 seconds
IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.40 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.107 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.784 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.995 seconds
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series
Output:
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them
2026-04-03 8:56 [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-04 9:54 ` bluez.test.bot
@ 2026-04-07 16:44 ` Paul Menzel
2026-04-08 1:15 ` Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-09 20:21 ` bluez.test.bot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2026-04-07 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pengpeng Hou
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, linux-bluetooth,
linux-kernel
Dear Pengpeng,
Thank you for your patch. Just a note, that the date/time mismataches:
Received: from 0002-bnep.eml (unknown [111.196.245.197])
by APP-05 (Coremail) with SMTP id zQCowACHFwsG0dBp_7RzDA--.49444S2;
Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:51:18 +0800 (CST)
From: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 16:56:12 +0800
Am 03.04.26 um 10:56 schrieb Pengpeng Hou:
> `bnep_rx_frame()` pulls the first byte from the skb and immediately reads
> the control type from the remaining data. Short control packets can leave
> no bytes in the skb at that point.
>
> The later control-message pull logic also reads `skb->data + 1` before
> proving that the length byte or 16-bit filter length is actually present.
>
> Validate the required control-header bytes before each dereference and
> drop malformed frames through the existing bad-frame path.
Do you have by chance a reproducer?
> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
> index d44987d4515c..0e7a7fb758c9 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
> @@ -299,18 +299,27 @@ static int bnep_rx_frame(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = s->dev;
> struct sk_buff *nskb;
> - u8 type, ctrl_type;
> + u8 type;
>
> dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
>
> + if (!skb->len)
> + goto badframe;
> +
> type = *(u8 *) skb->data;
> skb_pull(skb, 1);
> - ctrl_type = *(u8 *)skb->data;
>
> if ((type & BNEP_TYPE_MASK) >= sizeof(__bnep_rx_hlen))
> goto badframe;
>
> if ((type & BNEP_TYPE_MASK) == BNEP_CONTROL) {
> + u8 ctrl_type;
> +
> + if (!skb->len)
> + goto badframe;
> +
> + ctrl_type = *(u8 *)skb->data;
> +
> if (bnep_rx_control(s, skb->data, skb->len) < 0) {
> dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -326,12 +335,16 @@ static int bnep_rx_frame(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
> switch (ctrl_type) {
> case BNEP_SETUP_CONN_REQ:
> /* Pull: ctrl type (1 b), len (1 b), data (len bytes) */
> + if (skb->len < 2)
> + goto badframe;
gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview commented on this hunk.
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260404101002.2-bnep-pengpeng%40iscas.ac.cn
> if (!skb_pull(skb, 2 + *(u8 *)(skb->data + 1) * 2))
> goto badframe;
> break;
> case BNEP_FILTER_MULTI_ADDR_SET:
> case BNEP_FILTER_NET_TYPE_SET:
> /* Pull: ctrl type (1 b), len (2 b), data (len bytes) */
> + if (skb->len < 3)
> + goto badframe;
> if (!skb_pull(skb, 3 + *(u16 *)(skb->data + 1) * 2))
> goto badframe;
> break;
Kind regards,
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them
2026-04-03 8:56 [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-04 9:54 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-07 16:44 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
@ 2026-04-08 1:15 ` Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-09 20:21 ` bluez.test.bot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pengpeng Hou @ 2026-04-08 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menzel
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, linux-bluetooth,
linux-kernel, pengpeng
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the review.
The Date/Received mismatch is on me. I resent from a locally generated
patch file and preserved its original Date header, so the SMTP receive
time ended up being newer than the message Date. I will correct that on
the next resend.
I do not have a polished userspace reproducer prepared yet, but the bug
can be triggered with short malformed BNEP payloads passed to
bnep_rx_frame().
The minimal cases are:
1. 0x01 (or 0x81)
This is a 1-byte BNEP_CONTROL frame. After the initial skb_pull(skb, 1),
skb->len becomes 0, but the current code still does
ctrl_type = *(u8 *)skb->data;
2. 0x81 0x01
This is BNEP_CONTROL | BNEP_EXT_HEADER with ctrl_type
BNEP_SETUP_CONN_REQ. Later, in the control-message pull path,
the code reads
*(u8 *)(skb->data + 1)
for the length byte, even though only the ctrl byte is present.
3. 0x81 0x03 or 0x81 0x05
These are BNEP_FILTER_NET_TYPE_SET / BNEP_FILTER_MULTI_ADDR_SET.
Later the code reads
*(u16 *)(skb->data + 1)
for the 16-bit length field, even though that field is absent.
So the issue is reproducible with truncated control skb payloads before
any valid length byte / 16-bit length field is available.
If useful, I can also turn one of the above cases into a small standalone
reproducer for the receive path.
Thanks,
Pengpeng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them
2026-04-03 8:56 [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them Pengpeng Hou
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-08 1:15 ` Pengpeng Hou
@ 2026-04-09 20:21 ` bluez.test.bot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bluez.test.bot @ 2026-04-09 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth, pengpeng
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6877 bytes --]
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1077246
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.41 seconds
GitLint PENDING 0.44 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.05 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 26.64 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 29.72 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 28.65 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 26.41 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 574.12 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 27.93 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 37.96 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.37 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 114.94 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.57 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.54 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.28 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.60 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.60 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.69 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.87 seconds
IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.38 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.103 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-g8eb098256f88 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888001abe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888002094c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280
__sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260
__x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c
-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70
__lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0
sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g8eb098256f88 #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60
__might_resched+0x2ea/0x500
lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0
? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210
? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10
? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10
? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110
? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x368/0x490
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50
? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60
...
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.676 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.994 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-g8eb098256f88 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880026e0940 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffb4a4d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30
chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00
l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920
l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0
hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30
-> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980
lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660
full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190
vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60
ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c
-> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
...
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series
Output:
https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/44/checks
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-09 20:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-03 8:56 [PATCH] Bluetooth: BNEP: validate control header bytes before reading them Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-04 9:54 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-04-07 16:44 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2026-04-08 1:15 ` Pengpeng Hou
2026-04-09 20:21 ` bluez.test.bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox