From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f178.google.com (mail-dy1-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E5742F851 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775915923; cv=none; b=ufzO+TNR8owNTQXRs/qP+RqOwg4aFCRG7jSMuMSxzfOJL3PxMy2K/AWDiD735xb0qGmrF0JPFshD3DAXD6xVIvsEYHjNRbvxGxzgonzlYSdNmDutZ3oi+K/abpHHUeULMR4h3/2uDBzrMCc6LShk1vY9jn7CVP4PZEDLTXPsq4E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775915923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X9qpARMr7Ivyz6i6/2dnypxv8ZGHaFazQ/zBbd2dZY8=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=FZ/ctHNAts++tWRF2rDtv/73CoE4mEY1p2/v9OvX+eVp6X/oQr1DhtXuA0wODzCS186/nJXg803udY+lSUnzcU/ADimYg1ydFwQ1l305OrkUtaVb5PI4lu2EE9L3YhKs3HNgCxP3gezzgGgJrf/vWVjcOpYMApifOuYYi076paY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=hce1R3mN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hce1R3mN" Received: by mail-dy1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2ce102afb0aso3880194eec.1 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 06:58:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775915921; x=1776520721; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NaX+4DAa/SLvsdILRtJFhsrzSUqydaub+g64uNacbZQ=; b=hce1R3mNKRZ2sza4X6kP9T7kOHZToEiyyjQu8Jg1ryhPLlcoIwq49CTz3k947gQVL/ mDTLgu41qLC6AHosKct9bCXhlNk18lsiDsN+0MJOms0Vn/bTWuSe3NJkGdjoYni56cY7 YzuIDXySZ32UKa/sc0se5BNNbcZOZ8NZ55cxtHgKA/YKScFNIpZtlZk7K5P1z1oJYsm1 zKdeMw+dUp2aS1Ozol3emkwbFEu2OopBv+Eerre0bd56+H15WhVteRZj1EhNRVWRm/m9 H4K/uDpxc+oVas/AhcpqiN42rW+iAgK+2g878dRg7m2i4OHXa8GDwwGYkr+4ebebGaAi 3XjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775915921; x=1776520721; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NaX+4DAa/SLvsdILRtJFhsrzSUqydaub+g64uNacbZQ=; b=PT9uUSGQljX2iPHRC4/bNfCAdVpx/ipdIsyzY9RNrZWxWNMnWhsYdOCayV/f2t/lxp LeL34wLBoKenXB0hwla03Q7zlw13GMQw64oEmPMQVp7SlRfHHa85Qj4t28/v18LB62pt U6cGNBnF07oK9/ljtD4gBKTPslZEtGVu/GR2APV8Jh3P8MrL0I3DloIUpMb0D11JSz19 6iLWCLq9qE1X6W6YawRSbxaJ8f1ktx7pKwgapeBmqS0R/S04mQf3Ur91YlBS0thTbVyc fV5leL1Iogr3hVkWSsTSsQNGvdSQ6rK6HbMfijhh6ug8SIPpP17/18tSJZHshV2UHOVv LQ1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwXcPK8/kjnUsFl3JGQCcw1xZ7yWbOJKS6J+C7kQQn9ytYAC7vY 2y6+2XBiSfbYqpz5VWtpqrzZHrK9UhrkKbGq1AVrfbWq+LXkH274Oz895x2qpA== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesYWq+TjiwOGgY0jYccOY+VDiHyX1/w5swrzQdQFQ476BS5uLGNxxe7Zi9K8X0 4hNzfVvmnrY913eHeLQFfUx8xa2upU9PYnp3/Mcv1gDBZ4pY/x4tpSvD4VtBFdVAgDdJFo+0jj9 4SsdvmV0SIbqfnN1NpMv/bTb+bMjiPN+IIS2rPiFmt9WPmKid2ZqnxOyMd6aUW01XHjv49drJtd t21od0TnAyDVYyIVrVb6hB+7L2si1IvcKQH5OuteC2rJkoRFnnsS22FwmsZYnaAXubrvrz1GAkD QMrp46kADShUv5u9hi7HWKfJ2AlP/h+IAhqCM17J08pXBf478XlYuR7qBQD4eNA2YHtuO/LEGA1 mfRrUdCIzDMpLGzgwP2akqzd2VH9ixkpDzaOdBdJJA23TBmemp3HZ8tOuPoRJnNFXWucl05E8pU A/1OvGQl78/nDOYtJzyGhxwBqNK9BV X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:e986:b0:127:15cd:9f52 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-12c34e37b1fmr3971419c88.5.1775915920957; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 06:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([52.157.2.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-12c346fb26dsm6770640c88.14.2026.04.11.06.58.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Apr 2026 06:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69da5390.050a0220.1307f.8857@mx.google.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 06:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0517483561337753911==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, pav@iki.fi Subject: RE: Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix hci_conn_del usage in hci_le_create_conn_sync In-Reply-To: <8e7f8a9749b25162357bc8a64caf0429837a9191.1775911785.git.pav@iki.fi> References: <8e7f8a9749b25162357bc8a64caf0429837a9191.1775911785.git.pav@iki.fi> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============0517483561337753911== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1080113 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.48 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.52 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.07 seconds BuildKernel PASS 25.91 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 28.59 seconds CheckSparse PASS 27.16 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 25.34 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 566.48 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 28.61 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 37.73 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.22 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 116.89 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.36 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.44 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.11 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 11.59 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.55 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.61 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.81 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.37 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases L2CAP BR/EDR Server - Set PHY 1M Failed 0.122 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.115 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g92ec36913d92 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888002625240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88800246a220 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g92ec36913d92 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 1.788 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.997 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g92ec36913d92 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880027a7140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffbe84d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/67 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============0517483561337753911==--