From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f173.google.com (mail-dy1-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3FB25DB12 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2026 05:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775973560; cv=none; b=SqGtObl2bALADj6+3PZHX+E3ebUg+RydPovGhDjD7AJS+1RxsfF16HNmNAvXBwgTlVLvdpj1z1BDrRzmgVx74L9aLRSLPfePKfG7Zh2CoAb8ixiCb2phvL/28c08IvThfD35NFgPEr62ZAx8ygWCCT+DxvG2iZRSDW6j6CXO9xU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775973560; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PuanQNwAGr/+0akYtaNRXq5VLi5T8Ep0f4EBKnia90A=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=klA8AMY3yS+IzIGky2WGhjkCwpZz8aZzIL3cprZ2KEw7nWrm9roh8mG3Cg8BjK6Jf8c9X68hLHVybErxk0xUt+QY/+KiDrYipyiGRs5RmSTjkFbzfRUetGWlpy95dOWVyEIT/7T21fzOe0BXmdtZFgsR9iZYpqCE7oSXCFiyJzM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=YGJdxTPC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YGJdxTPC" Received: by mail-dy1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2c15849aa2cso4110765eec.0 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:59:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775973558; x=1776578358; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cUuUUya+bkPlQqCd8hfkuTvukIBeRE7PMbLVwIF3018=; b=YGJdxTPC16g+u+Eaq06xxTxfqK1SGEOigwgzt3vR/aw9+c7qprJM7KVPZ/L8ACqDW8 eiEgSsehqxBt7lHL86Ziw7dNSgnPdO2D/ZtdoJZ50IdYer2WO53mreEfICNy8kaTMF2C MXsk8cu6h2TXUzvRy357cWWXvXrV0yjnbZwvMJysXsUbrjybzEKmpSpSat3f0FvoloXr f5Ko0k+4c2BoeYWpyl5XDPVoWuEN5Sd1iEbR6Y+S1o0PgzRPpHDvxfcmzhN+iXWli1rt GJHkxR4aw0vof3ALQqQOkSV6oky5MwG2ch2JrUdtxCLyFGwEiU/VjPmjvRtiyTVBJUjp HrAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775973558; x=1776578358; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cUuUUya+bkPlQqCd8hfkuTvukIBeRE7PMbLVwIF3018=; b=DoWmflz0rKqPxm+C12moJP84/sTQ3q3Lt8m9OTuLoTSOqSK8QMq0y2XmMI/iXYyMOz CAaLNN95TsszdYyRz6nrFfP11VGJiGN9VC7/JaxHcZ4JiGZRYXb2B7EGduCG9OxctUt4 26CmAuvPxZJJCqNqntmqHD3O0g8tjlWb2SoCnSSawX3C0REl/gSLLrkEhL+kcdKqq4FQ 37vcffT0gH0oKqS38sW6JfGwMRku5bW0EYWL3b98jBebw5YPbrVmuFK19eTUxxMQY2Yh aT/EVsKYiLOY1V0MxJd4Yi216/9OzFYtTsHcWyXwGGKVeNMmb1qRere1unolXOF5qWtt hnqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyyPONkSwZNXrTTj4ErZiKBa48rE9Aq+2+xeS0jmpZqKDp+0ymR cMaeYbKMi4/xnFCFbfBbPVX9IUkO8D/lCRI0od27ZjV3eS0UAmg/wlFArcwVgQ== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesbwN0b/I22ENXhmUH68YAPggg9sRDibzCwa+lYJ9zjw1pOrrKANypkIl8CAdB hAXRMH8oirCMzxIFYYVwoYtgJ5U2nJdxVWdeklTll4Il/2WbQjLvKsqGzDFjImLD+NvFOxoLHTh 5wFzwhsQ2ae9lsPsf1jjYeUFUQKVGXsT7+yw/LwF0RDxcskrKy60AZtUECYyQGXbZlbPEj6xr36 liFr1YspfdT+KBrIOJozkZ9/4OcrVvSARQgUi+sUeZzwKPLFYkYjaMU3qJGcJ0XNQJq2q6S4gEG 7fwaO+7af1BO98lBj+l0nql4di9fiS0nYgV2AnKfagW8ss8+kl/SC6JdwpAzHcKFBBZrktC8wog pAJ2iQ/g7juMs8gDmwDJe4uIGfd/Wq3tWUotJ8P84x/QeTvohp+ddCOleo5GhuXmztS/nTTF1X6 R5B4lm2QMjjOxyJPx+oCKGKOHkAjYDwto= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7301:2b05:b0:2c9:ee15:a0fc with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2d58907cf63mr4737190eec.31.1775973558162; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([128.24.160.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2d5621d5e43sm10999744eec.21.2026.04.11.22.59.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69db34b5.050a0220.15b6ff.7491@mx.google.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5501324359177133117==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, suunj1331@gmail.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers In-Reply-To: <20260412045457.53100-1-suunj1331@gmail.com> References: <20260412045457.53100-1-suunj1331@gmail.com> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============5501324359177133117== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1080259 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.52 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.27 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.08 seconds BuildKernel PASS 24.64 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 27.00 seconds CheckSparse PASS 25.67 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 23.96 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 530.19 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 28.87 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 38.61 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.57 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 118.31 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.80 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.74 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.65 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.57 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.90 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 7.02 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 9.00 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.32 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases L2CAP BR/EDR Server - Set PHY 3M Failed 0.119 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.110 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g5632c26a4923 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001abe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880025fd220 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g5632c26a4923 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.538 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.993 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g5632c26a4923 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880026f4940 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff86c4d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/70 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============5501324359177133117==--