From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com (mail-qv1-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8823AC0C4 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776073249; cv=none; b=BbrvbU5WGrff9tBlAaEBVv5u4Kmeu6eeIarS00dIe+wyhtxbs41pLEv4SQ3Hu37DAWeUy3/7B5Q65jpLtG3x4pG03DLKPM93u4hajyny8N1Y/es6VcUr7y2B0AEmc0QBbSFX2Bv6eLgMZfGeEoFSx0FJrCttYlFn3LB92ldA+n0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776073249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c0pfFkBS0nZFCxXeUFFrvwI6rLafj9+6XqQisTkUiRw=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=K3XMt/UDJ6Viwfr5txmh2z9NZwkFEWLXFD0XeILKRFfnPY658qI8HrGqAocp91PAYwZo6yqdpUUyDESVaUOC2yySf5b7hTKSUD976+hW4QRcZ314761Adxi/3uyn0E4sWg2PrC8Yn01xNek5q0TVhaMgRkoIYv2CqHjGxq8C9wA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=sJ5MdKLj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sJ5MdKLj" Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8aca0469204so13733316d6.2 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:40:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1776073247; x=1776678047; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lKDVqUpAuvzt3Y82+e7w4+EY3LrGNLFXmdHHPaOg4Xc=; b=sJ5MdKLjyK4GDsE6QlS+M8jdebjXxZsT0grauFvu5lbO+YuHMekJz6zD0GiCEUpVqL IlMGKV0IDU4H3alABEpe5hrbsmH2Jb7Vucup26UQ6IFY8mbBkwjwBgt7hyvN77I+mm3V NAkCh3BA73DKltW28plmlC02OBt/uGqMenGG/Ebz1jEHtoZsl+fs1ovJcCj7tozVZOso Vm9PZ3SmfxIdRQlalNy5ReEyry9iF62S14G+nNJFqAnBi+lAN1SAkvX7ht9Y5+8Z/Cl8 uRyfkgna+c/x2PjOw6PqN2cPNgTTXqC4a1nPygLDuLIjYBkFI3JYE+jCL883B1/06BL/ dt/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776073247; x=1776678047; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lKDVqUpAuvzt3Y82+e7w4+EY3LrGNLFXmdHHPaOg4Xc=; b=IkgkqUSICtDxaAnzBjEQ+4ZS5KQeIWT4OoG0O81JNMrXv7AS3KBlYZqfTIhKJOiGfo qdH3LF5PyBIYN9xw3Oc6gtBi30yHhggkpjkgBO7NOGJ5x0LZQU74vBFDabjusw6h6EKl cOxSk7EfQc5VhYZVzb8mhBN6YKf/Zh/iTiU3MpOo24cLpu5Wgllo3Vvx7f4AcqySsVVH zf6U0oBZ6k5C+0gqUpVGejjs+UPuy7s2RZO52hPSiD/vazSYBWWEaVQoWHxk9CQ2Dzl1 uP2vDLAgIuy6GOxCUGtwyLKGpKsUfEe1e7NjbQea5YIn1oQw5nymB5pi25Mk2ACYNJb5 UFqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMlBTTjKeH2lq8c2TQNIU8+XPwAamKLNcfhBaO7cgeQne0m3v5 4ZgEnUwZwUSypY1lASkMhqb7BQ+RDtqG7Gmk6RSPmNpSLZEk+qGMJLW/L4VtVw== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDieswYIETQtr1oMBFD4+Jn0Knr7l2jrAk0fzdRBc2ZLzFt761GADZUxICQmZ/fHu HIgSdyOKunHEWJgKED6un0NVZxQ3eFfJvwbx4YG+aBcPE3Tf3mgFhGEPS7wsVh0ZM9PC1cWc+h9 ORRQHlLYT6n6CyWbw+a61NfCNPVEWTaJW6RA1zeBqT6L8FDBPTToj6YFpprx9LQNv65++ZV5Q8a FeeUOArAk+bvIsBNBxgn/XD3WFsp2IqXHF6zFIS9ZrFoz1uLmRtAvSLmz2bKjUHdsydZuZgwpgd Q/Qu2fnJm2iPVdIzlwxvWXcuJBZlAU/z8HnmSJ0NXakKYuuOZ/HIp8RV8WI/MVoUkL/z453UZdQ /dDJ8BRgNuJzp1JWWYPbjx2br5qPEFsNFIclDcocrAKpVQlh6iGK+zxIj+/kd8u+P6UEqzfMc3e Icr+Ol5DdGivfeG1TsGOMDupM2RJ9yw9E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2683:b0:89c:5110:751a with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8ac862992afmr206522546d6.44.1776073246866; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([172.183.131.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-8ac8aea242fsm80619026d6.34.2026.04.13.02.40.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69dcba1e.050a0220.2b8943.e4be@mx.google.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7267046906098462511==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, phx0fer@gmail.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: hci_conn: Use disable_delayed_work_sync for le_conn_timeout In-Reply-To: <20260413085455.74585-1-phx0fer@gmail.com> References: <20260413085455.74585-1-phx0fer@gmail.com> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============7267046906098462511== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1080586 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.35 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.28 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.11 seconds BuildKernel PASS 27.69 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 30.82 seconds CheckSparse PASS 26.17 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 23.95 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 530.21 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 28.10 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 35.75 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.44 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 114.59 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.45 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.38 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.23 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.53 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.65 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.68 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 9.17 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.34 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases L2CAP LE Server - Set PHY Coded Failed 0.141 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.105 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g666e7bacebcb #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888001e19240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888002141c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g666e7bacebcb #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.729 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.996 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g666e7bacebcb #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888002454140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9f64d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/77 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============7267046906098462511==--