From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f177.google.com (mail-dy1-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F8C313522 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776291374; cv=none; b=DKAXPtY4K91c+PeaPDNiuY9K+SXpPD4myOM5G6SQrLkwKcJM9Sz7IgSuGQSkmKlgDdF6IyOA0gaZRTYFTix/X+Mbla1Gdwihx8eWgcmqGeCegf/ePfs2ELJ6qL9HaG6t6aXKeoEL1SQJsB6ObqebgxbIUI5lGtLtNF4c7z//8+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776291374; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mtQsxxJNTa46Iy+5HnBRsAv9PCkM8mwu+hai0Iz0nZc=; h=Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Subject: In-Reply-To:References; b=YKNN31LcY8kgw4SwFBCODxnLBBVSyADPbQRqtsrFRQJRv0wRGZYccmh12sP+rGC/lb18cIqpEqrHZLG4dOxXW3goHS8SJvIF8NJ8iW+hdcH3Ra1g2Z6x29Xpr5P6L+IrAcswe5CdIvBEk5oCgkcGdouqoRw9R/u/ZpRbTFVo+lc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=EIV7XP9M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="EIV7XP9M" Received: by mail-dy1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2de831d2b20so2361805eec.1 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:16:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1776291372; x=1776896172; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oRRGAkLLXYKwh95dKr7fpeSP7G4+ycefzUkC8Drry1E=; b=EIV7XP9MeM++XKJXxvdCRTvW5viv5A4xsxOzMrS4NsYeqDulz99fCtc3jrN/1BaJQ4 6m2TRFqBiblBy5+ATym7Z4t5tI5T0Oe/jw2tgnIsZfBB2mPsYh953BcG78s0lLcqRqAm UQMB9YiBQ+J5wV4bYTUBs6yL5BR8KE04+ttTAecFqJEUQAx3ihLsV8Ok2CLX4o8WhY2y WgK1kKKUnM1DSr6lUIBstP2byepC8PMNKhcAJsEJ0mjkkja8Dg0slgtHgBluxhQ0YXVB J2tanP8G9Hu3xNSNkclIv4D6hTVtMmA/X/UCFqrRhNF1RiFv9SXhKpRN4nGW1CbZFgx5 NKKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776291372; x=1776896172; h=reply-to:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=oRRGAkLLXYKwh95dKr7fpeSP7G4+ycefzUkC8Drry1E=; b=Rz/6nqvjNZ74VeSWVgm2epm8bvIATFhrQlXgGOEnVmfenjpEbseD4PbRK9/8nv4+Vy onU2MSQ2o3WM5O2wAZNngL4x3n2qRIsONZ4LjQ1R8KYZZCMvYZy+S1fqi26H3jUgUI4j 9Q30wedW/5Bokguq7QKE+KP11LjUdUh1NBCeWosTL3SPdZatNUNKIToLoNbAvMavlqPo XCI54wgXNvYS1YWZ4A/OWKsLG0kU1ZD/jy+r3HnpeudwCamNSz1TX6KY0VyP22+PLJK2 GCFWH4BFO8T2b+UeuqD9gKRerz8a/H1IwekBCHW9/1EYXLJrID61xzN6GpaY/hYfY9au eV9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwJYaMHZvDOR8Z6D6N4YnvzsmXJeXA3oCdwKRxZ5GtKAReFIHC j/DaEOkk5f9sO0XGIrZEokyukw75OJ0scegBVrEjFFfYprpmdbx+kB7AMrIoow== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievyVyokiRyQF/hnhnFqzNL3QrBY7YbHAsloYwRO8hmKIffHCXBqCEOHdE9SIFW 4zAjybjxRCsRBL1X4ciXPiXIW3CfCJRfFwV/mTU0/Mtz/Q8mmzDluaTNBoUPp/ruZ9w08A38+bU SJLg3kwmYHmOy1PInuPXiMIuGg2YPbdlBgweOXYEWjK5R7eM9Wfz5ZH21qjO/e6daP8zFzfqxuh yqBIjJQ1aD+qZX+yAqKdXpqlKlR9nyYLu0MiMI6Vauy8+hA4L+qlKqrizaZTH5Sudt1g4Wu5pup 19I7IM60TMjbyKAyXDuUA69r/+rThfTphRBwWYu3MkCpZ1SQKkRV2nHDZJe+Fs8ZrY8btDGJWZx 15aPAtfGSPLqdLyyIZJ89I1WqTvBQKZi4H/Pmy8QcCT3jYACzjh9tm61+AzcgUrprGXbOKwnLD9 /l1Zm3ebCC5rF9CXzBG6Gm/GuTwUXuQctY+u4O5Co= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7301:6706:b0:2b8:5159:eca5 with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2d5881ad264mr14579402eec.14.1776291371685; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([52.159.140.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2de8c10ad3dsm4839040eec.3.2026.04.15.15.16.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69e00e2b.050a0220.13c00e.7af7@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5620584743321148937==" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, oss@fourdim.xyz Subject: RE: [v2,RESEND] Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_sock_state_change_cb() In-Reply-To: <20260415205205.2366630-1-oss@fourdim.xyz> References: <20260415205205.2366630-1-oss@fourdim.xyz> Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============5620584743321148937== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1081743 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 0.53 seconds GitLint PASS 0.19 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.06 seconds BuildKernel PASS 25.81 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 28.74 seconds CheckSparse PASS 27.01 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 25.16 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 564.41 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 27.53 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 39.39 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.36 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 111.97 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.24 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 13.98 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.09 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.13 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.50 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.57 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.32 seconds IncrementalBuild PASS 23.99 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases L2CAP BR/EDR Server - Set PHY 1M Failed 0.116 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.103 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-ga84bb558bdec #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888002042240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888002090c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280 __sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70 __lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0 lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: ... BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-ga84bb558bdec #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60 ... Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.746 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.989 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner Output: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-ga84bb558bdec #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88800275c140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffad24d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30 chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00 l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0 hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 kthread+0x368/0x490 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30 -> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 __mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0 l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980 lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660 full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190 vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60 ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c -> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: ... Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/90 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============5620584743321148937==--