From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: RE: Support for block device NVMEM providers
Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69fcbb9e.050a0220.376a5e.6216@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507-block-as-nvmem-v2-1-bf17edd5134e@oss.qualcomm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 19481 bytes --]
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1091131
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch FAIL 6.79 seconds
GitLint FAIL 7.79 seconds
SubjectPrefix FAIL 0.88 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 26.57 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 29.41 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 28.88 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 26.60 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 578.47 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester FAIL 18.90 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 311.40 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester FAIL 18.63 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 23.51 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 41.48 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 80.61 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester FAIL 50.25 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 39.48 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 18.56 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester FAIL 18.58 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester PASS 35.03 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 54.54 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
[v2,4/8] block: implement NVMEM provider
WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol with at least 4 lines
#207: FILE: block/Kconfig:212:
+config BLK_NVMEM
+ bool "Block device NVMEM provider"
+ depends on OF
+ depends on NVMEM
+ help
+ Allow block devices (or partitions) to act as NVMEM providers,
+ typically used with eMMC to store MAC addresses or Wi-Fi
+ calibration data on embedded devices.
+
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#229:
new file mode 100644
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 244 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
/github/workspace/src/patch/14559647.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: Ignored message types: UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
##############################
Test: GitLint - FAIL
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
[v2,8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses
WARNING: I3 - ignore-body-lines: gitlint will be switching from using Python regex 'match' (match beginning) to 'search' (match anywhere) semantics. Please review your ignore-body-lines.regex option accordingly. To remove this warning, set general.regex-style-search=True. More details: https://jorisroovers.github.io/gitlint/configuration/#regex-style-search
1: T1 Title exceeds max length (85>80): "[v2,8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses"
##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL
Desc: Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
Output:
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
##############################
Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner
Output:
Crash detected:
==34== by 0x13350F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x1142AD: main (l2cap-tester.c:3295)
==34== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==34==
==34==
==34== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==34== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==34== at 0x483FF54: __strcmp_sse2 (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==34== by 0x115C46: read_info_callback (l2cap-tester.c:156)
==34== by 0x12E860: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x12F2F5: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x131D68: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x133B18: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x133F4F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x13350F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x1142AD: main (l2cap-tester.c:3295)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
Valgrind errors:
==34== by 0x115C46: read_info_callback (l2cap-tester.c:156)
==34== by 0x12E860: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x12F2F5: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x131D68: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x133B18: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x133F4F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x13350F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x1142AD: main (l2cap-tester.c:3295)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
==34== HEAP SUMMARY:
==34== in use at exit: 66,009 bytes in 462 blocks
==34== total heap usage: 592 allocs, 130 frees, 79,004 bytes allocated
==34==
==34== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== still reachable: 66,009 bytes in 462 blocks
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Crash detected:
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
Process 33 exited with status 139
reboot: Restarting system
reboot: machine restart
No test result found
##############################
Test: TestRunner_bnep-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run bnep-tester with test-runner
Output:
Crash detected:
==34== by 0x12CC4F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111CB3: main (bnep-tester.c:298)
==34== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==34==
==34==
==34== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==34== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==34== at 0x483FF54: __strcmp_sse2 (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==34== by 0x112206: read_info_callback (bnep-tester.c:101)
==34== by 0x1281B0: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x128B65: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x12B5D8: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x12D258: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x12D68F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x12CC4F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111CB3: main (bnep-tester.c:298)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
Valgrind errors:
==34== by 0x112206: read_info_callback (bnep-tester.c:101)
==34== by 0x1281B0: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x128B65: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x12B5D8: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x12D258: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x12D68F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x12CC4F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111CB3: main (bnep-tester.c:298)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
==34== HEAP SUMMARY:
==34== in use at exit: 25,264 bytes in 82 blocks
==34== total heap usage: 212 allocs, 130 frees, 38,256 bytes allocated
==34==
==34== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== still reachable: 25,264 bytes in 82 blocks
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Crash detected:
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
Process 33 exited with status 139
reboot: Restarting system
reboot: machine restart
No test result found
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Crash detected:
==34== by 0x14F4FF: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x12B999: main (mgmt-tester.c:15134)
==34== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==34==
==34==
==34== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==34== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==34== at 0x483FF54: __strcmp_sse2 (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==34== by 0x12F8E8: read_info_callback (mgmt-tester.c:181)
==34== by 0x14A740: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x14B2F5: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x14DD68: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x14FB08: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x14FF3F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x14F4FF: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x12B999: main (mgmt-tester.c:15134)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
Valgrind errors:
==34== by 0x12F8E8: read_info_callback (mgmt-tester.c:181)
==34== by 0x14A740: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x14B2F5: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x14DD68: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x14FB08: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x14FF3F: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x14F4FF: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x12B999: main (mgmt-tester.c:15134)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
==34== HEAP SUMMARY:
==34== in use at exit: 182,263 bytes in 2,112 blocks
==34== total heap usage: 2,389 allocs, 277 frees, 204,641 bytes allocated
==34==
==34== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== still reachable: 182,263 bytes in 2,112 blocks
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Crash detected:
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
Process 33 exited with status 139
reboot: Restarting system
reboot: machine restart
No test result found
##############################
Test: TestRunner_ioctl-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run ioctl-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 28, Passed: 0 (0.0%), Failed: 11, Not Run: 17
Failed Test Cases
Device List Timed out -31.790 seconds
Device Info Timed out -6.931 seconds
Reset Stat Timed out -6.938 seconds
Set Link Mode - ACCEPT Timed out -6.945 seconds
Set Pkt Type - DM Timed out -15.213 seconds
Set Pkt Type - DH Timed out -15.219 seconds
Set Pkt Type - HV Timed out -15.225 seconds
Set Pkt Type - 2-DH Timed out -15.234 seconds
Set Pkt Type - 2-DH Timed out -15.241 seconds
Set Pkt Type - ALL Timed out -15.247 seconds
Set ACL MTU - 1 Timed out -15.253 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_userchan-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run userchan-tester with test-runner
Output:
Crash detected:
==34== by 0x12D77F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111DFB: main (userchan-tester.c:392)
==34== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==34==
==34==
==34== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==34== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==34== at 0x483FF54: __strcmp_sse2 (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==34== by 0x11250B: read_info_callback (userchan-tester.c:88)
==34== by 0x128450: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x128E95: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x12C108: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x12DD88: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x12E1BF: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x12D77F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111DFB: main (userchan-tester.c:392)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
Valgrind errors:
==34== by 0x11250B: read_info_callback (userchan-tester.c:88)
==34== by 0x128450: request_complete (mgmt.c:320)
==34== by 0x128E95: can_read_data (mgmt.c:408)
==34== by 0x12C108: watch_callback (io-glib.c:173)
==34== by 0x48A304D: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A33FF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x48A36F2: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.6)
==34== by 0x12DD88: mainloop_run (mainloop-glib.c:65)
==34== by 0x12E1BF: mainloop_run_with_signal (mainloop-notify.c:196)
==34== by 0x12D77F: tester_run (tester.c:1085)
==34== by 0x111DFB: main (userchan-tester.c:392)
==34== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==34== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==34== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==34== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==34== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==34==
==34== HEAP SUMMARY:
==34== in use at exit: 26,001 bytes in 92 blocks
==34== total heap usage: 222 allocs, 130 frees, 38,997 bytes allocated
==34==
==34== LEAK SUMMARY:
==34== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== still reachable: 26,001 bytes in 92 blocks
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Crash detected:
==34== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==34== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==34==
==34== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==34== ERROR SUMMARY: 51 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
Process 33 exited with status 139
reboot: Restarting system
reboot: machine restart
No test result found
https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/152
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 15:24 [PATCH v2 0/8] Support for block device NVMEM providers Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 16:19 ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: net: wireless: qcom,ath10k: Add NVMEM MAC address cell Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qcom: Add NVMEM BD " Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] block: implement NVMEM provider Loic Poulain
2026-05-11 11:27 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] net: of_net: Add of_get_nvmem_eui48() helper for EUI-48 lookup Loic Poulain
2026-05-11 10:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Add NVMEM-backed BD address retrieval Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] Bluetooth: qca: Set NVMEM BD address quirks when address is invalid Loic Poulain
2026-05-11 11:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-07 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses Loic Poulain
2026-05-11 11:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-28 14:23 [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-04-28 17:44 ` Support for block device NVMEM providers bluez.test.bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69fcbb9e.050a0220.376a5e.6216@mx.google.com \
--to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox