Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, ali@iusegentoo.com
Subject: RE: Bluetooth: MSFT: validate evt_prefix_len against the response length
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 21:25:34 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a755e3e.4f25dbb9.39b3ac.cd7d@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807012555.97482-1-ali@iusegentoo.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3023 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1141853

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      1.00 seconds
VerifyFixes                   PASS      0.22 seconds
VerifySignedoff               PASS      0.22 seconds
GitLint                       FAIL      0.50 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.21 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      29.37 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      30.27 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      28.94 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      26.56 seconds
CheckKernelLLVM               SKIP      0.00 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      503.60 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      65.25 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      89.79 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      19.39 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        FAIL      221.13 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      25.57 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      32.03 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      26.93 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        FAIL      25.99 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      23.62 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      20.22 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester     PASS      23.05 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      25.50 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: GitLint - FAIL
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
Bluetooth: MSFT: validate evt_prefix_len against the response length

6: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "	if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp)) {"
7: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT supported features length mismatch");"
8: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "		goto failed;"
9: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "	}"
14: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "	msft->evt_prefix = kmemdup(rp->evt_prefix, rp->evt_prefix_len,"
15: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): "				   GFP_KERNEL);"
##############################
Test: CheckKernelLLVM - SKIP
Desc: Build kernel with LLVM + context analysis
Output:
Clang not found
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 501, Passed: 496 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4

Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success                           Failed       0.242 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1                               Timed out    2.403 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2                               Timed out    1.987 seconds


https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/545

---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07  1:25 [PATCH] Bluetooth: MSFT: validate evt_prefix_len against the response length Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-07  4:25 ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2026-08-07 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a755e3e.4f25dbb9.39b3ac.cd7d@mx.google.com \
    --to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
    --cc=ali@iusegentoo.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox