Re: AVRCP 1.4 : Future on Target Role

["David Stockwell" <dstockwell@frequency-one.com>]

Your observation that AVRCP 1.3 is not implemented is correct, and I am 
(finally!) actively back at work on implementing AVRCP 1.3, based on the 
control-api.txt documentation.  IMO, this would be a good foundation for 
1.4.

For my purposes, I am not keen on 1.4, personally I find it overcomplicated 
for what should be a relatively simple interface; however, obviously others 
differ.

Do you have an AVRCP CT (other than a headset) that you are working with?

David Stockwell

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Shivendra Agrawal" <ag.shivendra@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:16 AM
To: <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: AVRCP 1.4 : Future on Target Role

> Hi All,
>
> I have been looking at AVRCP 1.4 in BlueZ and intending to
> enhance/develop this profile for the target role. I have been
> following the discussion initiated by Sander van Grieken earlier last
> month, and as I understand, they are premitive and has scope for
> further enhancements.
>
> In the current BlueZ implementation, control-api.txt mentions few
> methods e.g. SendVendoeDependent, ChangePlayback..., that are not
> referred/implemented in the code, or I may be unable to find at right
> place.
> Further, there are some more AVRCP 1.4 TG specific Notify and Browsing
> commands that can be added.
>
> I am willing to define some preliminary interface APIs for Target
> Media Applications to register itself with BlueZ, and would come back
> with some idea proposal for your suggestions on improvements.
>
> I am keen to receive your feedback with some ideas and thoughts to put
> my effort in right direction.
>
> Question:
> Is anyone working on AVRCP 1.4 Target role profile development?
>
> Regards,
> Shivendra
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" 
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html