From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92209EE49A0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 05:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233074AbjHUFC0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 01:02:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35800 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231553AbjHUFCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 01:02:25 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760FEA3; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1F961F9E; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 05:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CBBDC433C7; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 05:02:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692594142; bh=/n3hR5EYT3KBFmLwBg1A5O09p9o/K88PJFEoXgWvlvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=uhqtSgTEGCMi0cDV7OxE56LMj9UAbkte1OuhFDuMc0g5++q8Uf3fHQQcKR2CofiGg u94JM9fWCOpqK2CTmVq3z0z1f/28d2Qb9m8m9UbD856x1lRHTjZA1OqguxMaMS2Vwx n3foqpmQFCxFdQEe/HdKrskG/o+IoeapGcEjCJ1gtUa9pYKS6FzFhdZ4odHfL/wRsa /LgljvaGKiJr+2Pdr6bzv+gfbAut43FIHFb4X2ZjF0CuplgBYUy3xT4E0aQl5K9OCt bv0bcTnoHvIv+SQPNm6p7qlNJPrZ7RKzIDQ8DWTD/dAHnMF/UirvZr5pGiF+R2cPvi pu8x9D06RDO3g== From: Kalle Valo To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Jeff Johnson , =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Armand , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ath11k , Linux Bluetooth Subject: Re: Fwd: Qualcomm NFA725A on T14s AMD Gen3: Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to send headers (or body or access otp area) References: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:02:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Bagas Sanjaya's message of "Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:16:17 +0700") Message-ID: <87il99j8dh.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Hi, > > I notice a bug report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: > >> Hello, >> >> (Sorry by advance if it's not the correct place to discuss that, but >> I tried other place like my distro kernel forum >> (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=286929), interactive >> chat, etc and nobody was able to help). >> >> [1] == Short summary == >> >> I have a lenovo T14S AMD Gen 3 with a *Qualcomm NFA725A* Wi-Fi card >> (which is actually reported by lspci as QCNFA765) and bluetooth >> never worked on it, failing to load the rampatch with "failed to >> send header" or "failed to send body" or "Failed to access otp area >> (-71)". >> >> Other people reports bluetooth as working >> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Lenovo_ThinkPad_T14s_(AMD)_Gen_3) >> and a work friend has a T16 AMD gen1 which seems to have exactly the >> same chipset and work flowlessly. So perhaps it's an hardware issue, >> but I don't know how to qualify it if so. >> >> => How can this be further qualified/debuged/workarounded? >> >> Any help, even RTFM pointing to corresponding manuals would be very >> much appreciated. This looks like a bluetooth bug so not related to ath11k (which is a Wi-Fi driver). -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches