From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Mark-yw Chen <mark-yw.chen@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tsqyirsn.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGp9LzpBUReZtrTEKgUr-+yvB+3tcs5hw7ziC4WaMRFNa2AYpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:52:31 +0200,
Sean Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 7:19 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Every once in a while we see a hung btmtksdio_flush() task:
> >
> > INFO: task kworker/u17:0:189 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > __cancel_work_timer+0x3f4/0x460
> > cancel_work_sync+0x1c/0x2c
> > btmtksdio_flush+0x2c/0x40
> > hci_dev_open_sync+0x10c4/0x2190
> > [..]
> >
> > It all boils down to incorrect time_is_before_jiffies() usage in
> > btmtksdio_txrx_work(). The btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop is expected
> > to be terminated if running for longer than 5*HZ. However the
> > timeout check is twisted: time_is_before_jiffies(old_jiffies + 5*HZ)
> > evaluates to true when old_jiffies + 5*HZ is in the past i.e. when a
> > timeout has occurred. Using OR with time_is_before_jiffies(txrx_timeout)
> > means that:
> > - before the 5-second timeout: the condition is `int_status || false`,
> > so it loops as long as there are pending interrupts.
> > - after the 5-second timeout: the condition becomes `int_status || true`,
> > which is always true.
> >
> > When the loop becomes infinite btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop never
> > terminates and never releases the SDIO host.
> >
> > Fix loop termination condition to actually enforce a 5*HZ timeout.
> >
> > Fixes: 26270bc189ea4 ("Bluetooth: btmtksdio: move interrupt service to work")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > index 5b0fab7b89b5..c6f80c419e90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void btmtksdio_txrx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > if (btmtksdio_rx_packet(bdev, rx_size) < 0)
> > bdev->hdev->stat.err_rx++;
> > }
> > - } while (int_status || time_is_before_jiffies(txrx_timeout));
> > + } while (int_status && time_is_after_jiffies(txrx_timeout));
>
> yes, loop continues only while there is interrupt work and the timeout
> deadline is still in the future
I stumbled on this while backporting to distro kernels, and I wonder
whether this change is correct.
IIUC, this essentially makes the loop exiting right after the first
cycle; the patch changed from time_is_before_jiffies() to *_after_*(),
not only the logical OR to AND, and *_after_*() returns false, so the
whole condition becomes false, too.
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 12:10 [PATCH] Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-06-09 14:38 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-06-10 6:52 ` [PATCH] " Sean Wang
2026-06-19 13:27 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2026-06-19 14:20 ` Tomasz Figa
[not found] ` <CAAFQd5DyDQo9vBH80YYQBW7Bgf64F1m9q44-jhf1cc75XYpftA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-06-19 14:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-06-19 14:53 ` Tomasz Figa
2026-06-10 8:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-06-11 17:58 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tsqyirsn.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mark-yw.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox