linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Nick Pelly <npelly@google.com>, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Allow Bluez to select flushable or non-flushable ACL packets with L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:40:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinOFG0NcADz2ewxyaPWiLpe52MFLP8GCEvFna2a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268167524.3712.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrot=
e:
> Hi Nick,
>
>> >>> >> Right now Bluez always requests flushable ACL packets (but does n=
ot
>> >>> >> set a flush timeout, so effectively they are non-flushable):
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> However it is desirable to use an ACL flush timeout on A2DP packe=
ts so
>> >>> >> that if the ACL packets block for some reason then the LM can flu=
sh
>> >>> >> them to make room for newer packets.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Is it reasonable for Bluez to use the 0x00 ACL packet boundary fl=
ag by
>> >>> >> default (non-flushable packet), and let userspace request flushab=
le
>> >>> >> packets on A2DP L2CAP sockets with the socket option
>> >>> >> L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > the reliable option has a different meaning. It comes back from th=
e old
>> >>> > Bluetooth 1.1 qualification days where we had to tests on L2CAP th=
at had
>> >>> > to confirm that we can detect malformed packets and report them. T=
hese
>> >>> > days it is just fine to drop them.
>> >>>
>> >>> Got it, how about introducing
>> >>>
>> >>> #define L2CAP_LM_FLUSHABLE 0x0040
>> >>
>> >> that l2cap_sock_setsockopt_old() sets this didn't give you a hint tha=
t
>> >> we might wanna deprecate this socket options ;)
>> >>
>> >> I need to read up on the flushable stuff, but in the end it deserves =
its
>> >> own socket option. Also an ioctl() to actually trigger Enhanced flush
>> >> might be needed.
>> >>
>> >>> struct l2cap_pinfo {
>> >>> =A0 =A0...
>> >>> =A0 =A0__u8 flushable;
>> >>> }
>> >>
>> >> Sure. In the long run we need to turn this into a bitmask. We are jus=
t
>> >> wasting memory here.
>> >
>> > Attached is an updated patch, that checks the LMP features bitmask
>> > before using the new non-flushable packet type.
>> >
>> > I am still using L2CAP_LM_FLUSHABLE socket option in
>> > l2cap_sock_setsockopt_old(), which I don't think you are happy with.
>> > So how about a new option:
>> >
>> > SOL_L2CAP, L2CAP_ACL_FLUSH
>> > which has a default value of 0, and can be set to 1 to make the ACL
>> > data sent by this L2CAP socket flushable.
>> >
>> > In a later commit we would then add
>> > SOL_ACL, ACL_FLUSH_TIMEOUT
>> > That is used to set an automatic flush timeout for the ACL link on a
>> > L2CAP socket. Note that SOL_ACL is new.
>> >
>> > But maybe this is not what you had in mind, so I'm looking for your
>> > advice before I implement this.
>>
>> Attached an updated patch for 2.6.32 kernel. We've been using this
>> patch successfully on production devices.
>
> can see anything wrong with that patch. However we need to use
> SOL_BLUETOOTH for it of course. So we need to come up with something to
> make this simple.
>
> An additional change I like to see is to use flags for booleans like
> flushable in the structures. Can you work on changing that.
>
> Also do we have decoding support for this in hcidump. It might be nice
> to include some really simple examples in the commit message.
>
> Regards

I would like to play a little bit with this, so is there any missing update=
s?

--=20
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Computer Engineer

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-16 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-09  3:50 RFC: Allow Bluez to select flushable or non-flushable ACL packets with L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE Nick Pelly
2009-12-09  5:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-09  5:26   ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-09  6:13   ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-10 22:03     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-16 21:59       ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-16 23:36         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-16 23:48           ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-18 23:05             ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-18 23:23               ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-18 23:50                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19  0:12                   ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-19  0:26                     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19  1:50                       ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-19  2:05                         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19  3:00                           ` Nick Pelly
2009-12-19  3:27                             ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19  3:00                           ` Perelet, Oleg
2009-12-19  7:46                           ` Johan Hedberg
2009-12-19  0:16                   ` Nick Pelly
2010-03-09 20:07         ` Nick Pelly
2010-03-09 20:45           ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-06-16 11:40             ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz [this message]
2010-06-16 12:04               ` Suraj
2010-06-16 15:14                 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2010-06-16 15:45                   ` Suraj
2010-06-16 16:26                   ` Nick Pelly
2010-06-17  5:09                     ` Suraj
2010-06-16 14:15               ` Nick Pelly
2010-12-09 10:37                 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2010-12-09 16:55                   ` Nick Pelly
2010-12-10  4:25                     ` Suraj Sumangala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTinOFG0NcADz2ewxyaPWiLpe52MFLP8GCEvFna2a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=npelly@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).