From: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
To: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, gustavo@padovan.org,
marcel@holtmann.org, pkrystad@codeaurora.org,
andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Bluetooth: Lock the L2CAP channel when sending
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 22:11:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA37ikZFFC-eyQ578aks3hiO8DYGwvbQADntZG82TUOkb91ALA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1205041444580.22429@mathewm-linux>
Hi Mat,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ulisses -
>
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
>> Hi Mat,
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The ERTM and streaming mode transmit queue must only be accessed while
>>> the L2CAP channel lock is held. Locking the channel before calling
>>> l2cap_chan_send ensures that multiple threads cannot simultaneously
>>> manipulate the queue when sending and receiving concurrently.
>>>
>>> L2CAP channel locking had previously moved to the l2cap_chan struct
>>> instead of the associated socket, so some of the old socket locking
>>> can also be removed in this patch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h | 2 --
>>> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Looks good. I'm just wondering if we still have issues with chan lock
>> versus sock lock elsewhere. Maybe you've done some auditing of this?
>
> I did an extensive review of the locking code with respect to ERTM last
> week, and I'm satisfied with the use of chan_lock there.
>
> The work to decouple l2cap_chan from sockets is not yet complete, so there
> are still socket locking calls at connect and disconnect time. The data path
> looks like it is clear of socket locks now.
Thanks, that's good to know.
Regards,
--
Ulisses Furquim
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://profusion.mobi
Mobile: +55 19 9250 0942
Skype: ulissesffs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-05 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 16:41 [PATCH 0/4] ERTM state machine changes, part 2 Mat Martineau
2012-05-02 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Fix a redundant and problematic incoming MTU check Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 18:55 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 20:39 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-04 20:37 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: Restore locking semantics when looking up L2CAP channels Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 18:58 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] Bluetooth: Lock the L2CAP channel when sending Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:06 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 21:54 ` Mat Martineau
2012-05-05 1:11 ` Ulisses Furquim [this message]
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] Bluetooth: Refactor L2CAP ERTM and streaming transmit segmentation Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:12 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 20:57 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-14 9:52 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-05-14 15:47 ` Mat Martineau
2012-05-02 21:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] ERTM state machine changes, part 2 Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:10 ` Ulisses Furquim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA37ikZFFC-eyQ578aks3hiO8DYGwvbQADntZG82TUOkb91ALA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulisses@profusion.mobi \
--cc=andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mathewm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pkrystad@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).