From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53BCC433E0 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B07821D93 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726579AbhAFJsD (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:48:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726328AbhAFJsC (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:48:02 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6D7C06134D for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 01:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id m25so5118674lfc.11 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 01:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xVbuaOe4quZ/LrVooKH17Ulqbxk3AuggFARrX6RfARU=; b=uoTTyziPTjwbMOmI+iHZnObcqTu2bMZVQ87oJJBERZ5iA6v6AhBciktpea+ibZwlNB nyXVLLpBzF67V+wEyBvBofbgs+rQd6QJ6AumBF8KqUGD5j2Ldhk4Z7iFBo9HIxP9WibF 0YcwTFin15dl6ioy5mxnxNVRigAo4OBJOCt0lhu7APebyA0yVLRNbDyZZsgw3gMlEw5h lesuAIRVwqD/pmkUlFEvdwwqSfvDHx6/33/B86cQZ7O/SK1f2Zn4N4iKtDi3oJfM1PPg mI3Mz+DJ1uhIYm+kKLd5dJRjl8/fQJ/CKBJUZRxOuqF+xtwrmZEHHL1QaQ+DSLUlseEt xtsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xVbuaOe4quZ/LrVooKH17Ulqbxk3AuggFARrX6RfARU=; b=MoHJBIBsaJvc9fhVTNB1g5ewD3UK5gUng5wBqcb+PRo6sNV/F6rUoIISfHZa5XHS8b ixxSyMg6gI/kOFIRBuOKMv0/RdManKk0bFdTa6GoRmUo8mu1yqxw4TIPPuKWEk8U4Ido 08YGC9zJXIImz4m5hAc/i6ZQNxXgBRx79xV2jHMr3ZgeqtC2/JWO8uqXfujd3g7Mf5rg /H1ST+Ns55lWsTdfFT7USvJWv/WVJshAaVWuo3mrQnYX0t9uoyYVCRBI9xt4LePvRVgV o52261//Fibu+b7ASHyb7tzbPtjrzw5V0u7TWd5i+f2dI5Hj80npHpkJgjE+qfVoGlpw utEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531znh7rrKRwRtsamF1MBNpRu8V2gCSQfYw3NipmkOnEDy4o9jQD bkzUBnK6gbfudCG4g6/1KOiShFCzyt9ckhJFjgq/nw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw74GiaNq1puq7INp+pfeRi0XPcuW7kWAA2WbqyosHKvHI8me5PML8muj17XjIhS2dS6mzrWRSghem+kTaHRH0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:74d:: with SMTP id c13mr1773220lfs.290.1609926440542; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 01:47:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201208172912.4352-1-hadess@hadess.net> <6e6d72ff9aa14a65d6d0df5bd68a6ad6887f31c2.camel@hadess.net> In-Reply-To: From: Archie Pusaka Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:47:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: Try harder to accept device not knowing options To: Bastien Nocera Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , Florian Dollinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Bastien, For the test L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-14-C, this patch is required to pass it. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git/commit/?id=5b8ec15d02f12148ef0185825217162b3bc341f4 I don't think it is merged yet into 5.10, so you might need to apply the patch yourself. Thanks, Archie On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 17:28, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:49 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > The tests fail for me in the same on a kernel with and without > > the > > patch: > > - Expected that the IUT transmits an L2CAP_ConfigRsp includes the > > unsupported option that Lower Tester sent. > > Final Verdict:FAIL > > L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-14-C finished > > > > Is this expected? I was using an 5.10-rc7 kernel with and without the > > patch I sent. I can send you the full results off-list if you want > > them. > > Any news on that? Is the error expected, should I test with a newer > version of the kernel? I'd really like to finally land this... >