From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59AAC4338F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722B060FA0 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229733AbhHCUdM (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:33:12 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:1787 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229577AbhHCUdL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:33:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10065"; a="274828155" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,292,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="274828155" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2021 13:32:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,292,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="521426514" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2021 13:32:58 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mB15o-004rIN-GE for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:32:52 +0300 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:32:52 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v1,1/5] serdev: Split and export serdev_acpi_get_uart_resource() Message-ID: References: <20210803192905.72246-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <6109a142.1c69fb81.eedb4.954c@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6109a142.1c69fb81.eedb4.954c@mx.google.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:04:18PM -0700, bluez.test.bot@gmail.com wrote: > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > Dear submitter, > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > This is a CI test results with your patch series: > PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=525847 ... > ############################## > Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - FAIL - 2.09 seconds > Run test-runner with smp-tester > Total: 8, Passed: 7 (87.5%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 > > Failed Test Cases > SMP Client - SC Request 2 Failed 0.022 seconds > > ############################## > Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 1.95 seconds > Run test-runner with userchan-tester > Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 Hmm... I have read logs and I have no clue how my series may affect this. Any BT expert here to shed a light? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko