From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Russ Weight <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] Bluetooth: btrtl: split the device initialization into smaller parts
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:53:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-hr0s8xkkM6AEpU@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <109d2b01-3e9a-4410-8f30-e393503ef7f6@stanley.mountain>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 05:35:18PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 11:42:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Martin Blumenstingl,
> >
> > The patch 26503ad25de8: "Bluetooth: btrtl: split the device
> > initialization into smaller parts" from Aug 2, 2018, leads to the
> > following static checker warning:
> >
> > drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize()
> > warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
> >
> > drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> > 559 btrtl_dev->fw_len = rtl_load_file(hdev, btrtl_dev->ic_info->fw_name,
> > 560 &btrtl_dev->fw_data);
> > 561 if (btrtl_dev->fw_len < 0) {
> > 562 rtl_dev_err(hdev, "firmware file %s not found\n",
> > 563 btrtl_dev->ic_info->fw_name);
> > 564 ret = btrtl_dev->fw_len;
> > 565 goto err_free;
> > 566 }
> > 567
> > 568 if (btrtl_dev->ic_info->cfg_name) {
> > 569 if (postfix) {
> > 570 snprintf(cfg_name, sizeof(cfg_name), "%s-%s.bin",
> > 571 btrtl_dev->ic_info->cfg_name, postfix);
> > 572 } else {
> > 573 snprintf(cfg_name, sizeof(cfg_name), "%s.bin",
> > 574 btrtl_dev->ic_info->cfg_name);
> > 575 }
> > 576 btrtl_dev->cfg_len = rtl_load_file(hdev, cfg_name,
> > 577 &btrtl_dev->cfg_data);
> > 578 if (btrtl_dev->ic_info->config_needed &&
> > 579 btrtl_dev->cfg_len <= 0) {
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Assume btrtl_dev->cfg_len == 0
> >
>
> This is the length of the firmware file. Does it make sense for
> request_firmware() to load empty files? Probably there is a test for
> this in the firmware code which rejects zero length files?
We don't know the size of the file until we try to read it. Although
kernel_read_file_from_path_initns() perhaps should allow for empty
files, I do agree it seems odd to use the firmware API for 0 length
files.
We should extend tools/testing/selftests/firmware/ to check for this.
Care for a patch?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-29 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 20:42 [bug report] Bluetooth: btrtl: split the device initialization into smaller parts Dan Carpenter
2025-03-21 14:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-29 21:53 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2025-04-02 11:04 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-hr0s8xkkM6AEpU@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox