From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.treblig.org (mx.treblig.org [46.235.229.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D0F1AAE0D for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.229.95 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727977894; cv=none; b=OeDvHzjTJkOxNkgw3eov1Jdr0AyAQvwS776PHTu8cnWJWVGMHaN9OoT3q5fUqV8yA/HgYR8uWOjuPxkOSav491ogpy1W1PFhdZlUtZvQob/QS3OJf5ir+jSlpr3tE/TNZG66b9dh1s75wLyX5j2l34MmQYfLxu4A/Cw2AcgsV/0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727977894; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UHzkMw++es1QxCZMuuw8zPYXNCq0nqCjj4ZS1Y6p4M0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=JMhu7YbBvuQkCCrTvZtAK10rMutxj5gPjPLY8HMO0KPRXGHBDMsPMqBEEQP9rN/D9VtNajHtHfo1b6QsBMa6GiMtmuZ5zG6FYKEvtaKoFKfROsX1acIinVBdfNoS1HWXYwOKErE1+mZCEswIG2EKKUdz7uye3XO+fjDghDtcTH4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=treblig.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=treblig.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=treblig.org header.i=@treblig.org header.b=DM82MLkx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.229.95 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=treblig.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=treblig.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=treblig.org header.i=@treblig.org header.b="DM82MLkx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=treblig.org ; s=bytemarkmx; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:From:Date:From :Subject; bh=Ul6j9mwcGcmNiWWQEg6Xzwswk/dC/2XvRqxnfzRIk5E=; b=DM82MLkxQwfZOMJM Hoib8rwk0cUURL66wO08A1BAJFNAV9faYQcgdO5hvp3h7pb+SpPlfSaYMxgbgkFl8fes9uKhnZSha c0Kj+9WZ7pVMtu34GSeTSmPiZD4ETfk7yT38mNpDgVQ19nx7340zQjOUURbFlxC+AmkH4scyrSpKf Ph6LTzJuHDk+EraBxZqt+DIDHFitxR7E3u5JiRaP/iCRQ0XsjeX8REFgaU6/vmuvPm0eaCt/R3Az/ VdqN4hQTLOR++1K1pGVtoAWFTbI2Cq0tjrMLb+pI56j8Fjl0lZ/r7Tq78Y8ZAdJOQno/oSF9Bo90n O+EDCFGXvNkInFq0XQ==; Received: from dg by mx.treblig.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1swPz1-008iEk-0a; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 17:51:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:51:23 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, kiran.k@intel.com, luiz.von.dentz@intel.com Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com Subject: of btintel_regmap_init Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/6.1.0-21-amd64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 17:48:59 up 148 days, 5:03, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) Hi, A script of mine noticed that btintel_regmap_init doesn't appear to be called anywhere; it was added way back by: commit d06f107bcd828a6c3ecd4a7d449d5d0c0dba0326 Author: Loic Poulain Date: Thu Oct 1 18:16:21 2015 +0200 Bluetooth: btintel: Add iBT register access over HCI support and I don't think it's ever been called since. Is this just dead code (which I'd be happy to prepare a patch to remove) or should this be called from somewhere? Dave P.S. I'm doing general deadcoding here, and don't know much about BT -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/