Re: Bluetooth kernel BUG with Intel AX211 (regression in 6.1.83)

[Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:30:18PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 12.06.24 14:04, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 03.06.24 22:03, Mike wrote:
> >>> On 29.05.24 11:06, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>> I understand that 6.9-rc5[1] worked fine, but I guess it will take some
> >>> time to be
> >>> included in Debian stable, so having a patch for 6.1.x will be much
> >>> appreciated.
> >>> I do not have the time to follow the vanilla (latest) release as is
> >>> likely the case for
> >>> many other Linux users.
> >>>
> >> Still no reaction from the bluetooth developers. Guess they are busy
> >> and/or do not care about 6.1.y. In that case:
> >>
> >> @Greg: do you might have an idea how the 6.1.y commit a13f316e90fdb1
> >> ("Bluetooth: hci_conn: Consolidate code for aborting connections") might
> >> cause this or if it's missing some per-requisite? If not I wonder if
> >> reverting that patch from 6.1.y might be the best move to resolve this
> >> regression. Mike earlier in
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c947e600-e126-43ea-9530-0389206bef5e@gmail.com/
> >> confirmed that this fixed the problem in tests. Jeremy (who started the
> >> thread and afaics has the same problem) did not reply.
> > 
> > How was this reverted?  I get a bunch of conflicts as this commit was
> > added as a dependency of a patch later in the series.
> > 
> > So if this wants to be reverted from 6.1.y, can someone send me the
> > revert that has been tested to work?
> 
> Mike, can you help out here, as you apparently managed a revert earlier?
> Without you or someone else submitting a revert I fear this won't be
> resolved...

Trying to reboostrap this, as people running 6.1.112 based kernel
seems still hitting the issue, but have not asked yet if it happens as
well for 6.114.

https://bugs.debian.org/1086447

Mike, since I guess you are still as well affected as well, does the
issue trigger on 6.1.114 for you and does reverting changes from
a13f316e90fdb1 still fix the issue? Can you send your
backport/changes?

Regards,
Salvatore