Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Bluetooth: convert remaining bluetooth socket families to getsockopt_iter
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 07:21:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah2GaClhUehy5ys9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABBYNZ+nvtMHcU9but5VEG891vyO=K0MF3OAGofANxzdLVmw-g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Luiz,

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 01:51:16PM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 7:12 AM Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Continue the conversion to .getsockopt_iter for the Bluetooth socket
> > families: hci_sock, ISO, RFCOMM, SCO and L2CAP. The first patch is a
> > small precursor that fixes a long-standing 1-byte put_user write in
> > hci_sock_getsockopt_old() so the subsequent conversion stays mechanical.
> >
> > The riskiest change in this series is the SCO BT_CODEC conversion: it
> > is the only one that drops an open-coded ptr cursor in favour of
> > relying on iter_out advancing naturally on every copy_to_iter() call.
> > Every other socket option is a near-mechanical s/copy_to_user/
> > copy_to_iter/ rewrite, but BT_CODEC walks a variable-length list of
> > codecs + capabilities and previously tracked its own write offset by
> > hand. Getting the cursor semantics wrong here would silently truncate
> > or misalign user-visible codec data.
> >
> > For more context about the motivation for this change, please check
> > commit 67fab22a7ad ("net: add getsockopt_iter callback to proto_ops")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - rebase the tree on top of bluetooth-next.
> > - Remove the selftest, which was mixing network and bluetooth together.
> > - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260511-getsock_three-v1-0-1461fa8786ab@debian.org
> >
> > To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
> > To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > ---
> > Breno Leitao (6):
> >       Bluetooth: hci_sock: write the full optval for getsockopt
> >       Bluetooth: hci_sock: convert to getsockopt_iter
> >       Bluetooth: ISO: convert to getsockopt_iter
> >       Bluetooth: RFCOMM: convert to getsockopt_iter
> >       Bluetooth: L2CAP: convert to getsockopt_iter
> >       Bluetooth: SCO: convert to getsockopt_iter
> >
> >  net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c    | 26 +++++++++++--------
> >  net/bluetooth/iso.c         | 27 ++++++++++----------
> >  net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c  | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 30 ++++++++++++----------
> >  net/bluetooth/sco.c         | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  5 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: c2f0079e8c42fd6814c8d6b1491e3ce0a0e3b3fa
> > change-id: 20260511-getsock_three-d0d7f1b2629e
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>
> There are some comments from sashiko on this:
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512-getsock_three-v2-0-30b7b22ef14c%40debian.org
>
> Now Im not sure the truncating is actually used by our tools, but that
> sounds like it could break userspace if we don't check properly, or
> have you already done this for other socket families and it was
> considered to be ok?

You're right — to clarify, the patch changes behavior when the user
provides a short optlen, preventing the overflow that existed before:

 - Old code: put_user(opt, (u32 __user *)optval) unconditionally
   writes sizeof(*ptr) bytes regardless of optlen, so optlen < 4
   would overflow the user buffer and return 0.

 - New code: copy_to_iter() respects the optlen boundary, eliminating
   the overflow — but now a short buffer fails the strict length check
   and returns -EFAULT instead of 0.

I don't believe any legitimate userspace relies on the old overflow
behavior, though there's a theoretical risk of breakage. I'm not deeply
familiar with the Bluetooth ecosystem specifically, but, I would prefer to
avoid the buffer overflow in such case.

I've addressed a similar issue in another subsystem recently:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260521-fix_llc-v2-1-ab44cc09179c@debian.org/

Anyway, let me know if you need me to change it.
--breno


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 11:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Bluetooth: convert remaining bluetooth socket families to getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] Bluetooth: hci_sock: write the full optval for getsockopt Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 13:44   ` Bluetooth: convert remaining bluetooth socket families to getsockopt_iter bluez.test.bot
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] Bluetooth: hci_sock: convert " Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] Bluetooth: ISO: " Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] Bluetooth: RFCOMM: " Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] Bluetooth: L2CAP: " Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 11:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] Bluetooth: SCO: " Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 17:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Bluetooth: convert remaining bluetooth socket families " patchwork-bot+bluetooth
2026-05-14 17:51 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-06-01 14:21   ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ah2GaClhUehy5ys9@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox