Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, marcel@holtmann.org,
	rshaffer@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/7] Bluetooth: Handle fragmented skbs in bt_sock_stream_recvmsg()
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:07:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008121643480.8460@linux-sea-02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100811042543.GA9428@vigoh>



On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:

> Hi Mat,
>
> * Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> [2010-08-10 12:15:02 -0700]:
>
>> When reading L2CAP skbuffs, add the ability to copy from
>> fragmented skbuffs generated during ERTM or streaming mode
>> reassembly.  This defers extra copying of L2CAP payloads
>> until the final, unavoidable copy to userspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
>> index 77a26fe..5e0375b 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ int bt_sock_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
>>  		}
>>
>>  		chunk = min_t(unsigned int, skb->len, size);
>> -		if (memcpy_toiovec(msg->msg_iov, skb->data, chunk)) {
>> +		if (skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, 0, msg->msg_iov, chunk)) {
>>  			skb_queue_head(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
>>  			if (!copied)
>>  				copied = -EFAULT;
>> @@ -354,7 +354,33 @@ int bt_sock_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
>>  		sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
>>
>>  		if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
>> -			skb_pull(skb, chunk);
>> +			int skb_len = skb_headlen(skb);
>
> Why are you using the header length here?

skb_headlen() returns the length of the first fragment.


>> +
>> +			if (chunk <= skb_len) {
>> +				__skb_pull(skb, chunk);
>> +			} else {
>> +				struct sk_buff *frag;
>> +
>> +				__skb_pull(skb, skb_len);
>> +				chunk -= skb_len;
>
> Why do we have this __skb_pull() here? I think skb_walk_frags() can
> handle everything.

That first __skb_pull() is necessary to deal with data in the first 
skbuff, and the skb_walk_frags() deals with anything in 
skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list.  The linked skb list looks roughly like 
this:

skb
  unsigned char *data -> (L2CAP data)
  struct sk_buff *frag_list -> 2nd frag
                                 unsigned char *data -> (more data)
                                 struct sk_buff *next -> 3rd frag
                                                           (etc.)

So the first frag is special - the pointer to the fragment is 
frag_list.  Each linked fragment after that uses the "next" pointer in 
the sk_buff struct.  The skb_walk_frags() macro starts with the 
sk_buff pointed to by frag_list, then follows the "next" links.



>> +
>> +				skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
>> +					if (chunk <= frag->len) {
>> +						/* Pulling partial data */
>> +						skb->len -= chunk;
>> +						skb->data_len -= chunk;
>> +						__skb_pull(frag, chunk);
>> +						break;
>
> If we break here what will happen whit the rest of the data to be
> pulled.

The data is left to be pulled later.  The skb is not freed until all 
the fragments are empty, and this is handled by existing code.  I've 
added the next couple of lines of context below to help explain.

>
>> +					} else if (frag->len) {
>> +						/* Pulling all frag data */
>> +						chunk -= frag->len;
>> +						skb->len -= frag->len;
>> +						skb->data_len -= frag->len;
>> +						__skb_pull(frag, frag->len);
>> +					}
>> +				}
>> +			}
>> +
>>  			if (skb->len) {
>>  				skb_queue_head(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
>>  				break;
                         }
                         kfree_skb(skb);

If the skb is not empty, it's pushed back on the head of the receive 
queue.  If it is empty, it's freed.

I based this approach on some code I found in the SCTP protocol.

--
Mat Martineau
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum



  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-13  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-10 19:14 [RFC 0/7] L2CAP fragmentation changes Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 19:14 ` [RFC 1/7] Bluetooth: Calculate L2CAP FCS on fragmented skbuffs Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 21:22   ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-08-10 21:57   ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-10 19:14 ` [RFC 2/7] Bluetooth: Use enhanced L2CAP header structure and symbolic values Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 21:39   ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-08-10 22:07   ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-11  2:24     ` Mat Martineau
2010-08-11  3:23       ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-10 19:15 ` [RFC 3/7] Bluetooth: Add FCS awareness to L2CAP HCI fragmentation Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 21:29   ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-08-11  3:35   ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-11  3:56     ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-12 23:36       ` Mat Martineau
2010-08-13 15:41         ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-12 23:26     ` Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 19:15 ` [RFC 4/7] Bluetooth: Linearize received L2CAP skbuffs Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 21:38   ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-08-11  3:58     ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-10 19:15 ` [RFC 5/7] Bluetooth: Handle fragmented skbs in bt_sock_stream_recvmsg() Mat Martineau
2010-08-11  4:25   ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-13  0:07     ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2010-08-10 19:15 ` [RFC 6/7] Bluetooth: Reassemble enhanced L2CAP PDUs using skb fragments Mat Martineau
2010-08-11  5:24   ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-08-13  0:11     ` Mat Martineau
2010-08-10 19:15 ` [RFC 7/7] Bluetooth: Do not limit enhanced L2CAP max PDU size to HCI MTU Mat Martineau
2010-08-11  5:25   ` Gustavo F. Padovan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1008121643480.8460@linux-sea-02 \
    --to=mathewm@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=rshaffer@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox