Re: [Bluez-devel] sdp_uuid32_to_uuid128, lack of declaration

[milosz danielewski <master@apnet.pl>]

Marcel Holtmann <marcel <at> holtmann.org> writes:

> 
> Hi Milosz,
> 
> > Why there are no sdp_uuid32_to_uuid128 declaration in sdp_lib.h
> > (bluez-libs-devel 3.7.1)? It would be useful, but in such situation I
> > cannot use it...
> 
> I think that is simply because nobody needed them before. Feel free to
> implement them and send a patch.

 As far, as I can see it's already implemented, just not exposed in header file.

> However UUID32 is the most unused UUID
> type. In general you should either use UUID16 for well known profile and
> service identifiers or UUID128 for your own identifiers.

 I've started to implement jsr82. When I create java object representing UUID
it's most convenient to pass 16 byte array from native C to Java. So, when I
iterate over service attributes, have to properly convert SDP_UUID32 to uuid128.
That's why I need to use sdp_uuid32_to_uuid128 (which is already implemented and
working). Only problem is ugly warning "implicit declaration".

milosz danielewski


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel