From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: From: "Kishore A K" To: , Cc: , , Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Re: [Bridge] bridging bluetooth bnep deviceswith kernel 2.6.6-* Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:49:33 +0530 The ifreq structure to br_dev_do_ioctl() gives you the interface index (rq->ifr_ifindex) which is currently not being used. May be it can help.. -Kishore >>> David Woodhouse 05/19/04 10:30PM >>> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 15:36 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Hmm, since all the blue tooth devices have the same address. > Deleting the first one will cause the entry in the forwarding table > to be deleted, that might cause your problem. Perhaps we need a > reference count on the number of interfaces with the same address = (yuck). That seems like a reasonable answer. I believe there's also some workstation hardware with multiple Ethernet devices, all sharing the same MAC address (=3D=3D hostid). It's not just Bluetooth. How does this work with VLAN bridging? Precisely what is it that's indexed on the interface's MAC address, rather than the (index of the) physical interface itself? --=20 dwmw2 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel