linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>, Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com
Cc: padovan@profusion.mobi, marcel@holtmann.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression caused by "Bluetooth: Map sec_level to link key requirements"
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:01:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yuny61b3pnm.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609083345.GA2894@dell.ccr.corp.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4535 bytes --]

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:33:45 +0900, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> wrote:

> The patch was not only fine but actually *needed* by the BITE. So
> reverting it will make some qualification tests fail.

Yeah, it seemed pretty obvious that the patch added some useful security
checks.

> There's no DUN support in the N900 by default and the only package I'm
> aware that provides it uses the command line rfcomm tool with high
> security on the socket to block just-works SSP pairing (since the rfcomm
> tool doesn't use the authorization framework to guarantee a user pop-up
> dialog). The SyncML code I can't comment on since I haven't seen it.

Service Name: Dial-Up Networking
Service RecHandle: 0x10000
Service Class ID List:
  "Dialup Networking" (0x1103)
  "Generic Networking" (0x1201)
Protocol Descriptor List:
  "L2CAP" (0x0100)
  "RFCOMM" (0x0003)
    Channel: 1
Profile Descriptor List:
  "Dialup Networking" (0x1103)
    Version: 0x0100

> So potentially this might be limited to high security sockets.
> Speculating further, if the device connecting to the N900 has a pre-2.1
> Bluetooth controller this could simply be about not having a 16-digit
> PIN which high security services require.

> So could whoever is able to
> reproduce the issue try repairing and entering a 16-digit PIN to see if
> the problem goes away?

I re-pair'ed using a manually entered a 16 digit pin, but now DUN setup
doesn't succeed at all.

> And if this is in fact the case then the kernel
> code is working exactly as it should; the only issue is that these
> services should really be using medium security level instead of high.

I cannot figure out how to reconfigure things so that they work again.

> hcidump -Rt > foo.log  from your test session will help as well

here's a dump of trying to start the syncml session:

HCI sniffer - Bluetooth packet analyzer ver 2.0
device: hci0 snap_len: 1028 filter: 0xffffffff
2011-06-09 09:36:27.729606 < 01 05 04 0D 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 18 CC 02 00 00 00 01 
2011-06-09 09:36:27.731045 > 04 0F 04 00 01 05 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.281075 > 04 12 08 00 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 01 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.435069 > 04 03 0B 00 0C 00 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 01 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.435115 < 01 1B 04 02 0C 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.437015 > 04 1B 03 0C 00 05 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.438023 > 04 0F 04 00 01 1B 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.439017 > 04 0B 0B 00 0C 00 BF EE 0F C6 98 3D 59 82 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.439051 < 01 1C 04 03 0C 00 01 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.441060 > 04 1B 03 0C 00 03 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.443060 > 04 0F 04 00 01 1C 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.448100 > 04 23 0D 00 0C 00 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.448133 < 01 19 04 0A 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 02 00 00 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.450059 > 04 0F 04 00 01 19 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.470089 > 04 07 FF 00 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 6E 61 6D 69 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.470129 < 01 11 04 02 0C 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.472099 > 04 0F 04 00 01 11 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.473061 > 04 17 06 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.473193 < 01 0B 04 16 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC CC CB 2A 77 3C 2E 5E 6B 75 87 
  67 EC 03 40 67 8E 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.485125 > 04 0E 0A 01 0B 04 00 6E F5 C1 5B 9B EC 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.503097 > 04 06 03 00 0C 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.503134 < 01 13 04 03 0C 00 01 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.505069 > 04 0F 04 00 01 13 04 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.533086 > 04 08 04 00 0C 00 01 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.533133 < 02 0C 00 0A 00 06 00 01 00 0A 01 02 00 02 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.539338 > 02 0C 20 10 00 0C 00 01 00 0B 01 08 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  00 
2011-06-09 09:36:28.672083 > 04 13 05 01 0C 00 01 00 
2011-06-09 09:36:36.509207 > 04 05 04 00 0C 00 13 

-- 
keith.packard@intel.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-09 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-09  7:20 Regression caused by "Bluetooth: Map sec_level to link key requirements" Keith Packard
2011-06-09  7:59 ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-06-09  8:33   ` Johan Hedberg
2011-06-09 17:01     ` Keith Packard [this message]
2011-06-09 17:11       ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-06-10  5:55         ` Johan Hedberg
2011-06-10  5:58           ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2011-06-19 11:11             ` Keith Packard
2011-06-19 17:59               ` Johan Hedberg
2011-06-19 19:01                 ` Keith Packard
2011-06-25  5:45                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-06-25 19:40                     ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-06-09  8:02 ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-06-09 17:04   ` Keith Packard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yuny61b3pnm.fsf@aiko.keithp.com \
    --to=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).