* Re: blktrace version number
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
@ 2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> Jens,
>
> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
>
> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
shortly after that :-)
I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: blktrace version number
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan D. Brunelle @ 2008-10-29 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>> Jens,
>>
>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
>>
>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
>
> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> shortly after that :-)
>
> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
>
Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: blktrace version number
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
@ 2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> >> Jens,
> >>
> >> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
> >>
> >> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> >> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> >> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> >> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
> >
> > I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> > shortly after that :-)
> >
> > I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
> >
>
> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: blktrace version number
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan D. Brunelle @ 2008-10-29 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>>>> Jens,
>>>>
>>>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
>>>>
>>>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
>>>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
>>>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
>>>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
>>> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
>>> shortly after that :-)
>>>
>>> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
>>>
>> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
>> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
>
> Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
> bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
> before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?
>
Sure, I think it's probably a good idea...
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: blktrace version number
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
@ 2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> >> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> >>>> Jens,
> >>>>
> >>>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> >>>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> >>>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> >>>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
> >>> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> >>> shortly after that :-)
> >>>
> >>> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
> >>>
> >> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
> >> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
> >
> > Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
> > bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
> > before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?
> >
>
>
> Sure, I think it's probably a good idea...
OK, push any pending updates bits you have today, and I'll tag the repo
as 1.0.0 tomorrow.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread