linux-btrace.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* blktrace version number
@ 2008-10-29 15:46 Christof Schmitt
  2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christof Schmitt @ 2008-10-29 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Jens,

do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?

There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".

thanks,

Christof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: blktrace version number
  2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
@ 2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
  2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> Jens,
> 
> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
> 
> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".

I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
shortly after that :-)

I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: blktrace version number
  2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
  2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
  2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan D. Brunelle @ 2008-10-29 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>> Jens,
>>
>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
>>
>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
> 
> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> shortly after that :-)
> 
> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
> 

Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)

Alan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: blktrace version number
  2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
  2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
  2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
@ 2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
  2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
  2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> >> Jens,
> >>
> >> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
> >>
> >> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> >> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> >> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> >> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
> > 
> > I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> > shortly after that :-)
> > 
> > I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
> > 
> 
> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)

Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: blktrace version number
  2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
  2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan D. Brunelle @ 2008-10-29 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>>>> Jens,
>>>>
>>>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
>>>>
>>>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
>>>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
>>>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
>>>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
>>> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
>>> shortly after that :-)
>>>
>>> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
>>>
>> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
>> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
> 
> Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
> bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
> before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?
> 


Sure, I think it's probably a good idea...

Alan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: blktrace version number
  2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
@ 2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2008-10-29 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> >> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> >>>> Jens,
> >>>>
> >>>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and
> >>>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which
> >>>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever
> >>>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree".
> >>> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0
> >>> shortly after that :-)
> >>>
> >>> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release?
> >>>
> >> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to
> >> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-)
> > 
> > Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a
> > bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done
> > before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0?
> > 
> 
> 
> Sure, I think it's probably a good idea...

OK, push any pending updates bits you have today, and I'll tag the repo
as 1.0.0 tomorrow.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-29 19:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-29 15:46 blktrace version number Christof Schmitt
2008-10-29 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 19:04 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-10-29 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 19:22 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-10-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).