linux-btrace.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* new blktrace release tag?
@ 2009-05-11 11:58 Martin Peschke
  2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Peschke @ 2009-05-11 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Hi Jens,
a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?

Thanks,
Martin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: new blktrace release tag?
  2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
@ 2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?

Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: new blktrace release tag?
  2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
  2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
  2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-11 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
>> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
>> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> 
> Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.

Thanks!

Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir?  :)

# tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
-rw-rw-r-- root/root       112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
-rw-rw-r-- root/root     18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
-rw-rw-r-- root/root      1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
-rw-rw-r-- root/root      5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
-rw-rw-r-- root/root      1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
-rw-rw-r-- root/root      1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
...


*grin*

Thanks,
-Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: new blktrace release tag?
  2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
  2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Mon, May 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> >> Hi Jens,
> >> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> >> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> >> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> > 
> > Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
> previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir?  :)
> 
> # tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root       112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root     18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root      5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
> ...

Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
(I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: new blktrace release tag?
  2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

On Mon, May 11 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, May 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> > >> Hi Jens,
> > >> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> > >> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> > >> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> > > 
> > > Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
> > previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir?  :)
> > 
> > # tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root       112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root     18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root      1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
> > ...
> 
> Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
> (I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
> re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!

Done, it should be ok now.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: new blktrace release tag?
  2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-11 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrace

Jens Axboe wrote:

>> Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
>> (I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
>> re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!
> 
> Done, it should be ok now.

Looks perfect, and makes my rawhide rpm build happier ;)

Thanks,
-Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-11 18:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).