* Re: new blktrace release tag?
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
@ 2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: new blktrace release tag?
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-11 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
>> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
>> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
>
> Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
Thanks!
Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir? :)
# tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
...
*grin*
Thanks,
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: new blktrace release tag?
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
2009-05-11 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Mon, May 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> >> Hi Jens,
> >> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> >> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> >> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> >
> > Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
> previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir? :)
>
> # tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
> -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
> ...
Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
(I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: new blktrace release tag?
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-11 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-05-11 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
On Mon, May 11 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, May 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11 2009, Martin Peschke wrote:
> > >> Hi Jens,
> > >> a lot of fixes have been committed since 1.0.0, a some which are
> > >> essential for users, like the sched_setaffinity() patch.
> > >> It would be useful to tag a new release, something like 1.0.1?
> > >
> > > Definitely. I'll tag a 1.0.1 right away.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Next time could you keep the tarball snapshot a bit more consistent with
> > previous versions, in particular with a top-level dir? :)
> >
> > # tar tvjf blktrace-1.0.1.tar.bz2
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 112 2009-05-11 07:00 .gitignore
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 18009 2009-05-11 07:00 COPYING
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1992 2009-05-11 07:00 Makefile
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 5030 2009-05-11 07:00 README
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1109 2009-05-11 07:00 act_mask.c
> > -rw-rw-r-- root/root 1362 2009-05-11 07:00 barrier.h
> > ...
>
> Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
> (I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
> re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!
Done, it should be ok now.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: new blktrace release tag?
2009-05-11 11:58 new blktrace release tag? Martin Peschke
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-11 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-05-11 18:03 ` Eric Sandeen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-11 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrace
Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Dang, I didn't realize that git archive didn't include a top level dir
>> (I just switched my scripts to use that last week). I'll fix that up and
>> re-generate the tar balls, thanks for letting me know!
>
> Done, it should be ok now.
Looks perfect, and makes my rawhide rpm build happier ;)
Thanks,
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread