From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan D. Brunelle" Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:22:46 +0000 Subject: Re: blktrace version number Message-Id: <4908B806.4050108@hp.com> List-Id: References: <20081029154658.GA27173@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20081029154658.GA27173@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote: >>>> Jens, >>>> >>>> do you plan to tag a new version in the blktrace git tree? >>>> >>>> There have been some new features included since version 0.99.3 and >>>> from time to time people ask which feature is available in which >>>> version. It would be simpler to say "use version 0.99.4" (or whatever >>>> the number would be) than "use the latest from the git tree". >>> I guess it has been way too long, my intention was to release 1.0 >>> shortly after that :-) >>> >>> I'm fine with doing that - Alan, is btt ready for a 1.0 release? >>> >> Hm, actually, btt is at 2.0.5 - I have updated btrecord/btreplay to >> 1.0.0 if you'd like me to push that... :-) > > Heh, nevermind the version of the individual packages. To phrase it a > bit more clearly, is there anything you feel that needs to be done > before I tag the whole repo as 1.0.0? > Sure, I think it's probably a good idea... Alan