From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan D. Brunelle" Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:36:32 +0000 Subject: Re: Question: blktrace server mode & orderly shut down Message-Id: <498C20C0.4070508@hp.com> List-Id: References: <4988C599.6070909@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <4988C599.6070909@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03 2009, Alan D. Brunelle wrote: >> According to the recv(2) man page: >> >> The return value will be 0 when the peer has performed an orderly >> shutdown. >> >> Yet the code in read_data_net and net_get_header both attempt to re-read >> from a socket that will _never_ have data. (I hit this problem today on >> blktrace2 - I've got orderly shut downs in place.) >> >> Does this pseudo-patch break something? >> >> diff --git a/blktrace.c b/blktrace.c >> index c55b491..9ef7313 100644 >> --- a/blktrace.c >> +++ b/blktrace.c >> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int read_data_net(struct thread_information >> *tip, voi >> ret = recv(nc->in_fd, buf, bytes_left, MSG_WAITALL); >> >> if (!ret) >> - continue; >> + return 0; >> else if (ret < 0) { >> if (errno != EAGAIN) { >> perror(tip->fn); >> @@ -1466,8 +1466,7 @@ static int net_get_header(struct net_connection *nc, >> usleep(1000); >> continue; >> } else if (!ret) { >> - usleep(1000); >> - continue; >> + return 0; >> } else { >> p += ret; >> bytes_left -= ret; > > My bad, I think the patch looks correct. Feel free to commit it, you can > add my acked-by to it. > OK, but this patch may not be sufficient: need to look at it some more (in particular, just doing this causes other errors to occur because the connections still try to be read - typically an infinite hang (reading 0)). In blktrace2 I'm adding in orderly shutdowns on both ends of the socket.