From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: use self-explaining variable
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:09:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02a5af04-f1b3-cdef-d77d-55c0517c12ad@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170923004837.GD8109@lim.localdomain>
On 2017年09月23日 08:48, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 08:46:55AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年09月23日 07:36, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> This uses a bool 'do_backup' to help understand this piece of code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> This is based on a patch "Btrfs: do not backup tree roots when fsync".
>>>
>>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> index cdb7043..9811b9d 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> @@ -3691,6 +3691,7 @@ int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int max_mirrors)
>>> int max_errors;
>>> int total_errors = 0;
>>> u64 flags;
>>> + bool do_backup = (max_mirrors == 0);
>>
>> Why not replacing @max_mirrors with @do_backup as parameter?
>
> If I read the code correctly, max_mirrors is not just for deciding
> backup.
That's strange.
write_all_supers() only uses @max_mirrors by passing it to
write_dev_supers() and wait_dev_supers().
Both of the write/wait_dev_supers() will replace @max_mirrors to
BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX if it's zero.
Further more, all write_all_supers() callers just pass @max_mirrors as
bool (either 0 or 1).
So I don't see any point not replacing the parameter as bool.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> thanks,
>
> -liubo
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>> do_barriers = !btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, NOBARRIER);
>>> @@ -3699,7 +3700,7 @@ int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int max_mirrors)
>>> * not from fsync where the tree roots in fs_info have not
>>> * been consistent on disk.
>>> */
>>> - if (max_mirrors == 0)
>>> + if (do_backup)
>>> backup_super_roots(fs_info);
>>> sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-23 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-13 18:25 [PATCH] Btrfs: do not backup tree roots when fsync Liu Bo
2017-09-14 1:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-09-14 12:49 ` David Sterba
2017-09-15 21:09 ` Liu Bo
2017-09-22 23:36 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: use self-explaining variable Liu Bo
2017-09-23 0:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-09-23 0:48 ` Liu Bo
2017-09-23 1:09 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-09-24 13:24 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02a5af04-f1b3-cdef-d77d-55c0517c12ad@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).