From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:61395 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796AbeBBBhK (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:37:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs-progs: Split lowmem mode check to its own To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20180201064541.14603-1-wqu@suse.com> <20180201160527.GL18553@twin.jikos.cz> From: Qu Wenruo Message-ID: <02cbb5ec-e3a0-96ba-41c0-a08e4a8c1a7b@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:54 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180201160527.GL18553@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iAYnlYr5KvOhh2KLhEvIAgsjx7JUcsvlk" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iAYnlYr5KvOhh2KLhEvIAgsjx7JUcsvlk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gjwdp0CrjefnVNg5yNmR7W8KOD3M8tbX9"; protected-headers="v1" From: Qu Wenruo To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <02cbb5ec-e3a0-96ba-41c0-a08e4a8c1a7b@gmx.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs-progs: Split lowmem mode check to its own References: <20180201064541.14603-1-wqu@suse.com> <20180201160527.GL18553@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20180201160527.GL18553@twin.jikos.cz> --gjwdp0CrjefnVNg5yNmR7W8KOD3M8tbX9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2018=E5=B9=B402=E6=9C=8802=E6=97=A5 00:05, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:45:38PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> As usual, the main part is over 500K so the biggest patch won't reach >> mail list. >> Please fetch the whole branch from github: >> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/split_check >=20 > Thanks, patches added to devel, with some more adjustments. >=20 >> Despite the update, a new patch is introduced, to address the tons of >> BORING errors and warning from checkpatch.pl. >=20 > The checkpatch script can report lots of things to fix, but please note= > that not all of them match the style we use. I've updated the patch 3/3= > and undone some of the line splits, because it's the example where the > code looks worse after fixing. Yep, some 81/82 chars modification is not that elegant. >=20 > We'd probably have to host our modified version of checkpatch so the > warnings don't get reported repeatedly. That would be the best case, I could take some spare time to port checkpatch to btrfs-progs. Thanks, Qu > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --gjwdp0CrjefnVNg5yNmR7W8KOD3M8tbX9-- --iAYnlYr5KvOhh2KLhEvIAgsjx7JUcsvlk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFLBAEBCAA1FiEELd9y5aWlW6idqkLhwj2R86El/qgFAlpzwLYXHHF1d2VucnVv LmJ0cmZzQGdteC5jb20ACgkQwj2R86El/qgZVgf/QYDMuz1HijUDJ2sfEfAkBLIv mPG0bSRttJn6ZkemMWhdiSV5GrucrdzqSrlsHC57oQWitLEtiPUy8Nr42Qi5tIe4 yS4tk5snLIhImcx909XUBTEiKpuap/V2BXMAP8cpRmQhCgfECBJOWyrsr314YA5A 7pFHPurpIfkTeArRcAzTLQkdtTrFwBZiDaRbSJY9pFZZGAKSodX8VUWmcrvC1b98 DrG4xcaEMfbv0CraQaLQqQ3MWVER7tl6tNKbyLStOytzrRV86C1TRsQ21TvJ1Sy6 P9Zbew8BmbtYd/F515uhdHqJsVj7wpZ+VEEuSqmFJXWTQrE36OBbQ3qNa140gg== =Z/dL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iAYnlYr5KvOhh2KLhEvIAgsjx7JUcsvlk--