* [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks
@ 2026-03-14 0:00 Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent() Qu Wenruo
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-03-14 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
[CHANGELOG]
v2:
- Minor grammar fixes
- Change the output message when overlapping OEs are found
- Use has_single_bit_set() to replace hweight*()
During my development of introduce a new DELAYED type, I incorrectly
called something like:
oe = alloc_ordered_extent(.., BTRFS_ORDERED_DELAYED, ..);
That doesn't trigger any warning at runtime, but will cause unexpected
bugs due to the fact that, BTRFS_ORDERED_* can not be directly used as a
flag. They are only bit numbers, thus should be utilized with bit
operations like "test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_DELAYED, ..)".
My stupid bug inspired me to enhance the @flags sanity checks in
alloc_ordered_extent().
The first one is to make sure that my stupid bug can always be caught
early.
The second one is to enhance the error message when a duplicated OE is
found during insert_ordered_extent().
Qu Wenruo (2):
btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent()
btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent()
2026-03-14 0:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-03-14 0:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found Qu Wenruo
2026-03-16 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks David Sterba
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-03-14 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Unlike other flags used in btrfs, BTRFS_ORDERED_* macros are different as
they can not be directly used as flags.
They are defined as bit numbers, thus they should be utilized with
bit operations, not directly with logical operations.
Unfortunately sometimes I forgot this and can pass the incorrect flags
to alloc_ordered_extent() and hit weird bugs.
Enhance the type checks in alloc_ordered_extent() by:
- Make sure there is one and only one bit set for exclusive type flags
There are four exclusive type flags, REGULAR, NOCOW, PREALLOC and
COMPRESSED.
So introduce a new macro, BTRFS_ORDERED_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS, to cover
above flags.
And add an ASSERT() to check one and only one of those exclusive flags
can be set for alloc_ordered_extent().
- Re-order the type bit numbers to the end of the enum
This is make it much harder to get a valid false negative.
E.g, with the old BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR starts at zero, we can have
the following flags passing the weight check:
* BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW
Be treated as BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR (1 == 1UL << 0).
* BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC
Be treated as BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW (2 == 1UL << 1).
* BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT
Be treated as BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC (4 == 1UL << 2).
Now all those types starts at 8, passing any of those bit numbers as
flags directly will not pass the ASSERT().
- Add a static assert to avoid overflow
To make sure all BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags can fit into an unsigned long.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 13 ++++++++++
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index 8405d07b49cd..de6b60c52292 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -156,6 +156,19 @@ static struct btrfs_ordered_extent *alloc_ordered_extent(
const bool is_nocow = (flags &
((1U << BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW) | (1U << BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC)));
+ /* Only one type flag can be set. */
+ ASSERT(has_single_bit_set(flags & BTRFS_ORDERED_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS));
+
+ /* DIRECT cannot be set with COMPRESSED nor ENCODED. */
+ if (test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT, &flags)) {
+ ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED, &flags));
+ ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_ENCODED, &flags));
+ }
+
+ /* ENCODED must be set with COMPRESSED. */
+ if (test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_ENCODED, &flags))
+ ASSERT(test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED, &flags));
+
/*
* For a NOCOW write we can free the qgroup reserve right now. For a COW
* one we transfer the reserved space from the inode's iotree into the
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
index cd74c5ecfd67..ccae3d7c0c05 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
@@ -47,8 +47,25 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_sum {
* IO is done and any metadata is inserted into the tree.
*/
enum {
+ /* Extra status bits for ordered extents */
+
+ /* Set when all the pages are written */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE,
+ /* Set when removed from the tree */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE,
+ /* We had an io error when writing this out */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR,
+ /* Set when we have to truncate an extent */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_TRUNCATED,
+ /* Used during fsync to track already logged extents */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED,
+ /* We have already logged all the csums of the ordered extent */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED_CSUM,
+ /* We wait for this extent to complete in the current transaction */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_PENDING,
+
/*
- * Different types for ordered extents, one and only one of the 4 types
+ * Different types for ordered extents, one and only one of those types
* need to be set when creating ordered extent.
*
* REGULAR: For regular non-compressed COW write
@@ -61,37 +78,27 @@ enum {
BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC,
BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED,
+ /* Extra bit for encoded write, must be set with COMPRESSED. */
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_ENCODED,
+
/*
* Extra bit for direct io, can only be set for
- * REGULAR/NOCOW/PREALLOC. No direct io for compressed extent.
+ * REGULAR/NOCOW/PREALLOC. Must not be set for COMPRESSED nor ENCODED.
*/
BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT,
- /* Extra status bits for ordered extents */
-
- /* set when all the pages are written */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE,
- /* set when removed from the tree */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE,
- /* We had an io error when writing this out */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR,
- /* Set when we have to truncate an extent */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_TRUNCATED,
- /* Used during fsync to track already logged extents */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED,
- /* We have already logged all the csums of the ordered extent */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED_CSUM,
- /* We wait for this extent to complete in the current transaction */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_PENDING,
- /* BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_WRITE */
- BTRFS_ORDERED_ENCODED,
+ BTRFS_ORDERED_NR_FLAGS,
};
+static_assert(BTRFS_ORDERED_NR_FLAGS <= BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+/* One and only one flag can be set. */
+#define BTRFS_ORDERED_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS ((1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR) | \
+ (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW) | \
+ (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC) |\
+ (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED))
/* BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags that specify the type of the extent. */
-#define BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS ((1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR) | \
- (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW) | \
- (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC) | \
- (1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED) | \
+#define BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS (BTRFS_ORDERED_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS | \
(1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT) | \
(1UL << BTRFS_ORDERED_ENCODED))
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found
2026-03-14 0:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent() Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-03-14 0:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-16 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks David Sterba
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-03-14 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
During development of a new feature, I triggered that btrfs_panic()
inside insert_ordered_extent() and spent quite some unnecessary before
noticing I'm passing incorrect flags when creating a new ordered extent.
Unfortunately the existing error message is not providing much help.
Enhance the output to provide file offset, num bytes and flags of both
existing and new ordered extents.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index de6b60c52292..d39f1c49d1cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -253,10 +253,15 @@ static void insert_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *entry)
spin_lock(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
node = tree_insert(&inode->ordered_tree, entry->file_offset,
&entry->rb_node);
- if (unlikely(node))
+ if (unlikely(node)) {
+ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *exist =
+ rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_ordered_extent, rb_node);
+
btrfs_panic(fs_info, -EEXIST,
- "inconsistency in ordered tree at offset %llu",
- entry->file_offset);
+"overlapping ordered extents, existing oe file_offset %llu num_bytes %llu flags 0x%lx, new oe file_offset %llu num_bytes %llu flags 0x%lx",
+ exist->file_offset, exist->num_bytes, exist->flags,
+ entry->file_offset, entry->num_bytes, entry->flags);
+ }
spin_unlock(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
spin_lock(&root->ordered_extent_lock);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks
2026-03-14 0:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent() Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-03-16 8:49 ` David Sterba
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2026-03-16 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 10:30:37AM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [CHANGELOG]
> v2:
> - Minor grammar fixes
> - Change the output message when overlapping OEs are found
> - Use has_single_bit_set() to replace hweight*()
>
>
> During my development of introduce a new DELAYED type, I incorrectly
> called something like:
>
> oe = alloc_ordered_extent(.., BTRFS_ORDERED_DELAYED, ..);
>
> That doesn't trigger any warning at runtime, but will cause unexpected
> bugs due to the fact that, BTRFS_ORDERED_* can not be directly used as a
> flag. They are only bit numbers, thus should be utilized with bit
> operations like "test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_DELAYED, ..)".
>
> My stupid bug inspired me to enhance the @flags sanity checks in
> alloc_ordered_extent().
>
> The first one is to make sure that my stupid bug can always be caught
> early.
>
> The second one is to enhance the error message when a duplicated OE is
> found during insert_ordered_extent().
>
> Qu Wenruo (2):
> btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent()
> btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-16 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-14 0:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: check type flags in alloc_ordered_extent() Qu Wenruo
2026-03-14 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: output more info when duplicated ordered extent is found Qu Wenruo
2026-03-16 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: enhance BTRFS_ORDERED_* flags sanity checks David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox