From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out11.mail.aliyun.com ([205.204.117.240]:31014 "HELO
	out11.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1753694Ab3JUPqD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:46:03 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:45:58 +0800
From: "lilofile" <lilofile@aliyun.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Reply-To: "lilofile" <lilofile@aliyun.com>
Message-ID: <0833228b-7a17-49f8-836a-2565a6b9af0c@aliyun.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?YnRyZnMgcmFpZDU=?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

hi:
    since RAID 5/6 code merged into Btrfs from  2013.2, no update and bug are found in maillist? is any development plan with btrfs raid5? such as adjusting stripe width、 reconstruction？
  compared to md raid5  what is advantage in btrfs raid5 ?