From: Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@virtall.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs progs release 3.18
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:38:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09d8530e73aed4552f1b3a6297c20360@admin.virtall.com> (raw)
> * filesystem usage - give an overview of fs usage in a way (道, みち,
> michi) that's more
> * device usage - more detailed information about per-device allocations
> * same restrictions as for 'fi usage'
Interesting.
Used these to create a filesystem, with btrfs-progs v3.17.3:
# mkfs.btrfs -O skinny-metadata -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4 -f
Now, with btrfs-progs 3.18 and these new options I can see that the fs
is partially single, not RAID-1 - how come?
# btrfs fil us /srv
Overall:
Device size: 5.25TiB
Device allocated: 510.04GiB
Device unallocated: 4.76TiB
Used: 505.39GiB
Free (estimated): 2.38TiB (min: 2.38TiB)
Data ratio: 2.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
Data,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
/dev/sda4 8.00MiB
Data,RAID1: Size:252.00GiB, Used:250.56GiB
/dev/sda4 252.00GiB
/dev/sdb4 252.00GiB
Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
/dev/sda4 8.00MiB
Metadata,RAID1: Size:3.00GiB, Used:2.13GiB
/dev/sda4 3.00GiB
/dev/sdb4 3.00GiB
System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
/dev/sda4 4.00MiB
System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:64.00KiB
/dev/sda4 8.00MiB
/dev/sdb4 8.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/sda4 2.38TiB
/dev/sdb4 2.38TiB
root@backup01 ~ # btrfs dev us /srv
/dev/sda4, ID: 1
Device size: 2.63TiB
Data,single: 8.00MiB
Data,RAID1: 252.00GiB
Metadata,single: 8.00MiB
Metadata,RAID1: 3.00GiB
System,single: 4.00MiB
System,RAID1: 8.00MiB
Unallocated: 2.38TiB
/dev/sdb4, ID: 2
Device size: 2.63TiB
Data,RAID1: 252.00GiB
Metadata,RAID1: 3.00GiB
System,RAID1: 8.00MiB
Unallocated: 2.38TiB
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://www.sslrack.com
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 21:38 Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2014-12-30 21:44 ` Btrfs progs release 3.18 Hugo Mills
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-30 16:34 David Sterba
2014-12-30 17:25 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09d8530e73aed4552f1b3a6297c20360@admin.virtall.com \
--to=tch@virtall.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).