From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Gladyshev Ilya <foxido@foxido.dev>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] btrfs: simplify return path via cleanup.h
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 07:20:01 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a31cf84-ccfe-4da4-b922-85da570c6e3b@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bfb05436ed8f80bc060a745805d54309cdba59c.1762972845.git.foxido@foxido.dev>
在 2025/11/13 05:19, Gladyshev Ilya 写道:
> In some functions removing cleanup paths allows to overall simplify it's
> code, so replace cleanup paths with guard()s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gladyshev Ilya <foxido@foxido.dev>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c | 21 ++++-----
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 46 ++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c
> index 69ea2bd359a6..88d7aed7055f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c
> @@ -890,9 +890,8 @@ bool btrfs_find_first_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
> struct extent_state **cached_state)
> {
> struct extent_state *state;
> - bool ret = false;
>
> - spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&tree->lock);
> if (cached_state && *cached_state) {
> state = *cached_state;
> if (state->end == start - 1 && extent_state_in_tree(state)) {
> @@ -911,23 +910,21 @@ bool btrfs_find_first_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
> *cached_state = NULL;
> if (state)
> goto got_it;
> - goto out;
> + return false;
> }
> btrfs_free_extent_state(*cached_state);
> *cached_state = NULL;
> }
>
> state = find_first_extent_bit_state(tree, start, bits);
> + if (!state)
> + return false;
> +
> got_it:
> - if (state) {
> - cache_state_if_flags(state, cached_state, 0);
> - *start_ret = state->start;
> - *end_ret = state->end;
> - ret = true;
> - }
> -out:
> - spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> - return ret;
> + cache_state_if_flags(state, cached_state, 0);
> + *start_ret = state->start;
> + *end_ret = state->end;
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index f9744e456c6c..cb3d61d96e66 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -1878,16 +1878,14 @@ static int cleanup_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> * and then re-check to make sure nobody got added.
> */
> spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> - spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> - spin_lock(&head->lock);
> - if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root) || head->extent_op) {
> - spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> - spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> - return 1;
> + {
There are some internal discussion about such anonymous code block usage.
Although I support such usage, especially when it can reduce the
lifespan of local variables, it's not a commonly accepted pattern yet.
Thanks,
Qu
> + guard(spinlock)(&delayed_refs->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&head->lock);
> +
> + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root) || head->extent_op)
> + return 1;
> + btrfs_delete_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, head);
> }
> - btrfs_delete_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, head);
> - spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> - spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
>
> if (head->must_insert_reserved) {
> btrfs_pin_extent(trans, head->bytenr, head->num_bytes, 1);
> @@ -3391,30 +3389,29 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> int ret = 0;
>
> delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs;
> - spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> - head = btrfs_find_delayed_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, bytenr);
> - if (!head)
> - goto out_delayed_unlock;
> -
> - spin_lock(&head->lock);
> - if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root))
> - goto out;
> + {
> + guard(spinlock)(&delayed_refs->lock);
> + head = btrfs_find_delayed_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, bytenr);
> + if (!head)
> + return 0;
>
> - if (cleanup_extent_op(head) != NULL)
> - goto out;
> + guard(spinlock)(&head->lock);
> + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root))
> + return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * waiting for the lock here would deadlock. If someone else has it
> - * locked they are already in the process of dropping it anyway
> - */
> - if (!mutex_trylock(&head->mutex))
> - goto out;
> + if (cleanup_extent_op(head) != NULL)
> + return 0;
>
> - btrfs_delete_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, head);
> - head->processing = false;
> + /*
> + * waiting for the lock here would deadlock. If someone else has it
> + * locked they are already in the process of dropping it anyway
> + */
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&head->mutex))
> + return 0;
>
> - spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> - spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> + btrfs_delete_ref_head(fs_info, delayed_refs, head);
> + head->processing = false;
> + }
>
> BUG_ON(head->extent_op);
> if (head->must_insert_reserved)
> @@ -3424,12 +3421,6 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> mutex_unlock(&head->mutex);
> btrfs_put_delayed_ref_head(head);
> return ret;
> -out:
> - spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> -
> -out_delayed_unlock:
> - spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> int btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> @@ -3910,13 +3901,13 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> */
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
> - spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock);
> - spin_lock(&fs_info->relocation_bg_lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&space_info->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&block_group->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&fs_info->relocation_bg_lock);
>
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
>
> ASSERT(!ffe_ctl->for_treelog ||
> block_group->start == fs_info->treelog_bg ||
> @@ -3928,8 +3919,7 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> if (block_group->ro ||
> (!ffe_ctl->for_data_reloc &&
> test_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONED_DATA_RELOC, &block_group->runtime_flags))) {
> - ret = 1;
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3938,8 +3928,7 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> */
> if (ffe_ctl->for_treelog && !fs_info->treelog_bg &&
> (block_group->used || block_group->reserved)) {
> - ret = 1;
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3948,8 +3937,7 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> */
> if (ffe_ctl->for_data_reloc && !fs_info->data_reloc_bg &&
> (block_group->used || block_group->reserved)) {
> - ret = 1;
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(block_group->alloc_offset > block_group->zone_capacity);
> @@ -3963,8 +3951,7 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> ffe_ctl->max_extent_size = avail;
> ffe_ctl->total_free_space = avail;
> }
> - ret = 1;
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> if (ffe_ctl->for_treelog && !fs_info->treelog_bg)
> @@ -4003,17 +3990,14 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> */
>
> ffe_ctl->search_start = ffe_ctl->found_offset;
> + return 0;
>
> -out:
> - if (ret && ffe_ctl->for_treelog)
> +err:
> + if (ffe_ctl->for_treelog)
> fs_info->treelog_bg = 0;
> - if (ret && ffe_ctl->for_data_reloc)
> + if (ffe_ctl->for_data_reloc)
> fs_info->data_reloc_bg = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->relocation_bg_lock);
> - spin_unlock(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock);
> - spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
> - spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
> - return ret;
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static int do_allocation(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index 451b60de4550..4dbec4ef4ffd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -995,35 +995,29 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(
> struct rb_node *node;
> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *entry = NULL;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> + guard(spinlock_irq)(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> node = ordered_tree_search(inode, file_offset);
> if (!node) {
> node = ordered_tree_search(inode, file_offset + len);
> if (!node)
> - goto out;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> while (1) {
> entry = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_ordered_extent, rb_node);
> - if (btrfs_range_overlaps(entry, file_offset, len))
> - break;
> + if (btrfs_range_overlaps(entry, file_offset, len)) {
> + refcount_inc(&entry->refs);
> + trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_lookup_range(inode, entry);
> + return entry;
> + }
>
> if (entry->file_offset >= file_offset + len) {
> - entry = NULL;
> - break;
> + return NULL;
> }
> - entry = NULL;
> node = rb_next(node);
> if (!node)
> - break;
> + return NULL;
> }
> -out:
> - if (entry) {
> - refcount_inc(&entry->refs);
> - trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_lookup_range(inode, entry);
> - }
> - spin_unlock_irq(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> - return entry;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1092,7 +1086,7 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_range(
> struct rb_node *next;
> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *entry = NULL;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> + guard(spinlock_irq)(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> node = inode->ordered_tree.rb_node;
> /*
> * Here we don't want to use tree_search() which will use tree->last
> @@ -1112,12 +1106,12 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_range(
> * Direct hit, got an ordered extent that starts at
> * @file_offset
> */
> - goto out;
> + goto ret_entry;
> }
> }
> if (!entry) {
> /* Empty tree */
> - goto out;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> cur = &entry->rb_node;
> @@ -1132,22 +1126,20 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_range(
> if (prev) {
> entry = rb_entry(prev, struct btrfs_ordered_extent, rb_node);
> if (btrfs_range_overlaps(entry, file_offset, len))
> - goto out;
> + goto ret_entry;
> }
> if (next) {
> entry = rb_entry(next, struct btrfs_ordered_extent, rb_node);
> if (btrfs_range_overlaps(entry, file_offset, len))
> - goto out;
> + goto ret_entry;
> }
> /* No ordered extent in the range */
> - entry = NULL;
> -out:
> - if (entry) {
> - refcount_inc(&entry->refs);
> - trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_lookup_first_range(inode, entry);
> - }
> + return NULL;
> +
> +ret_entry:
> + refcount_inc(&entry->refs);
> + trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_lookup_first_range(inode, entry);
>
> - spin_unlock_irq(&inode->ordered_tree_lock);
> return entry;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 18:49 [RFC PATCH 0/8] use cleanup.h in btrfs Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] btrfs: remove redundant label in __del_qgroup_relation Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] btrfs: move kfree out of btrfs_create_qgroup's cleanup path Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 20:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] btrfs: simplify control flow in scrub_simple_mirror Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] btrfs: simplify function protections with guards Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-13 8:43 ` David Sterba
2025-11-13 10:06 ` Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-13 11:25 ` David Sterba
2025-11-13 12:30 ` Daniel Vacek
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] btrfs: use cleanup.h guard()s to simplify unlocks on return Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] btrfs: simplify cleanup via scoped_guard() Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-13 8:48 ` David Sterba
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] btrfs: simplify return path via cleanup.h Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 20:50 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-11-13 8:54 ` David Sterba
2025-11-13 12:48 ` Daniel Vacek
2025-11-12 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] btrfs: simplify cleanup in btrfs_add_qgroup_relation Gladyshev Ilya
2025-11-12 20:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-11-12 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] use cleanup.h in btrfs Qu Wenruo
2025-11-13 8:01 ` Gladyshev Ilya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a31cf84-ccfe-4da4-b922-85da570c6e3b@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=foxido@foxido.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox