From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/18] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:52:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c9c616c46ae86e51d153316d55918eac74b83ad.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Btrfs will need to check whether inode policies are identical for
various purposes: if two inodes want to share an extent, they must have
the same policy, including key identifier; symlinks must not span the
encrypted/unencrypted border; and certain encryption policies will allow
btrfs to store one fscrypt_context for multiple objects. Therefore, add
a function which allows checking the encryption policies of two inodes
to ensure they are identical.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
---
fs/crypto/policy.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/fscrypt.h | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
index 46757c3052ef..715870d4e530 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
@@ -415,6 +415,41 @@ static int fscrypt_get_policy(struct inode *inode, union fscrypt_policy *policy)
return fscrypt_policy_from_context(policy, &ctx, ret);
}
+/**
+ * fscrypt_have_same_policy() - check whether two inodes have the same policy
+ * @inode1: the first inode
+ * @inode2: the second inode
+ * @same_ptr: a pointer to return whether they are the same
+ *
+ * Return: 0 or an error code.
+ */
+int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+ bool *same_ptr)
+{
+ union fscrypt_policy policy1, policy2;
+ int err;
+
+ if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2)) {
+ *same_ptr = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) || !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2)) {
+ *same_ptr = false;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode1, &policy1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode2, &policy2);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ *same_ptr = fscrypt_policies_equal(&policy1, &policy2);
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_have_same_policy);
+
static int set_encryption_policy(struct inode *inode,
const union fscrypt_policy *policy)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
index 7661db0b5bec..0069f92ee3da 100644
--- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
@@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static inline struct page *fscrypt_pagecache_page(struct page *bounce_page)
void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page);
/* policy.c */
+int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+ bool *same_ptr);
int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp, const void __user *arg);
int fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(struct file *filp, void __user *arg);
int fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy_ex(struct file *filp, void __user *arg);
@@ -490,6 +492,12 @@ static inline void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page)
}
/* policy.c */
+static inline int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1,
+ struct inode *inode2)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
static inline int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp,
const void __user *arg)
{
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 11:52 [PATCH v5 00/18] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] fscrypt: extent direct key policies for " Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT feature flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] btrfs: permit searching for nokey names for removal Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] btrfs: use correct name hash for nokey names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] btrfs: encrypt verity items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] btrfs: allow encrypting compressed extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Paul Crowley
2022-11-16 20:08 ` Neal Gompa
2022-11-16 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-16 20:19 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-21 17:26 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-24 1:22 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-28 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-28 18:44 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-28 20:34 ` Paul Crowley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c9c616c46ae86e51d153316d55918eac74b83ad.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).