linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/18] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2022 07:52:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c9c616c46ae86e51d153316d55918eac74b83ad.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>

Btrfs will need to check whether inode policies are identical for
various purposes: if two inodes want to share an extent, they must have
the same policy, including key identifier; symlinks must not span the
encrypted/unencrypted border; and certain encryption policies will allow
btrfs to store one fscrypt_context for multiple objects. Therefore, add
a function which allows checking the encryption policies of two inodes
to ensure they are identical.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
---
 fs/crypto/policy.c      | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/fscrypt.h |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
index 46757c3052ef..715870d4e530 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
@@ -415,6 +415,41 @@ static int fscrypt_get_policy(struct inode *inode, union fscrypt_policy *policy)
 	return fscrypt_policy_from_context(policy, &ctx, ret);
 }
 
+/**
+ * fscrypt_have_same_policy() - check whether two inodes have the same policy
+ * @inode1: the first inode
+ * @inode2: the second inode
+ * @same_ptr: a pointer to return whether they are the same
+ *
+ * Return: 0 or an error code.
+ */
+int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+			     bool *same_ptr)
+{
+	union fscrypt_policy policy1, policy2;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2)) {
+		*same_ptr = true;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) || !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2)) {
+		*same_ptr = false;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode1, &policy1);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode2, &policy2);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	*same_ptr = fscrypt_policies_equal(&policy1, &policy2);
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_have_same_policy);
+
 static int set_encryption_policy(struct inode *inode,
 				 const union fscrypt_policy *policy)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
index 7661db0b5bec..0069f92ee3da 100644
--- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
@@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static inline struct page *fscrypt_pagecache_page(struct page *bounce_page)
 void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page);
 
 /* policy.c */
+int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+			     bool *same_ptr);
 int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp, const void __user *arg);
 int fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(struct file *filp, void __user *arg);
 int fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy_ex(struct file *filp, void __user *arg);
@@ -490,6 +492,12 @@ static inline void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page)
 }
 
 /* policy.c */
+static inline int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1,
+					   struct inode *inode2)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static inline int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp,
 					   const void __user *arg)
 {
-- 
2.37.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-02 11:52 [PATCH v5 00/18] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] fscrypt: extent direct key policies for " Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:52 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT feature flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] btrfs: permit searching for nokey names for removal Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] btrfs: use correct name hash for nokey names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] btrfs: encrypt verity items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] btrfs: allow encrypting compressed extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Paul Crowley
2022-11-16 20:08   ` Neal Gompa
2022-11-16 20:35     ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-16 20:19   ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-21 17:26     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-24  1:22       ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-11-28  7:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-28 18:44           ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-28 20:34           ` Paul Crowley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c9c616c46ae86e51d153316d55918eac74b83ad.1667389115.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).