From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Roderick Johnstone <rmj@ast.cam.ac.uk>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broken filesystem
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:34:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d7012d4-0274-aa8b-1a49-9c269f3cfdf1@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d1be873-541a-96dd-0795-16a4fb2d4556@ast.cam.ac.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3518 bytes --]
On 2019/2/19 下午6:24, Roderick Johnstone wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is on Fedora 28:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux mysystem.mydomain 4.20.7-100.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6 19:17:09
> UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> # btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.17.1
>
> # btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: 56d0171a-440d-47ff-ad0f-f7f97df31f7b
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 7.39TiB
> devid 1 size 9.10TiB used 7.50TiB path /dev/md2
>
>
> My btrfs filesystem is in a bad state after a partial disk failure on
> the md device (raid 6 array) the file system was on.
>
> One of the disks had bad blocks, but instead of being ejected from the
> array, the array hung up.
I'm a little interested why RAID6 hung up.
> After rebooting to regain access and remove
> the bad disk I am in the following situation:
>
> # mount -t btrfs -o compress-force=zlib,noatime /dev/md2 /mnt/rmj
> mount: /mnt/rmj: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md2,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
> # dmesg
> ...
> 264.527647] BTRFS info (device md2): force zlib compression, level 3
> [ 264.955360] BTRFS error (device md2): parent transid verify failed on
> 5568287064064 wanted 254988 found 94122
It's 99% some extent tree blocks get corrupted.
> [ 264.964273] BTRFS error (device md2): open_ctree failed
>
> I can mount and access the filesystem with the usebackuproot option:
>
> # mount -t btrfs -o usebackuproot,compress-force=zlib,noatime /dev/md2
> /mnt/rmj
> [ 307.542761] BTRFS info (device md2): trying to use backup root at
> mount time
> [ 307.542768] BTRFS info (device md2): force zlib compression, level 3
> [ 307.570897] BTRFS error (device md2): parent transid verify failed on
> 5568287064064 wanted 254988 found 94122
> [ 307.570979] BTRFS error (device md2): parent transid verify failed on
> 5568287064064 wanted 254988 found 94122
> [ 431.167149] BTRFS info (device md2): checking UUID tree
>
> But later after a umount there are these messages.
>
> # umount /mnt/rmj
> 2205.778998] BTRFS error (device md2): parent transid verify failed on
> 5568276393984 wanted 254986 found 94117
> [ 2205.779008] BTRFS: error (device md2) in __btrfs_free_extent:6831:
> errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 2205.779082] BTRFS info (device md2): forced readonly
> [ 2205.779087] BTRFS: error (device md2) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2978:
> errno=-5 IO failure
> [ 2205.779192] BTRFS warning (device md2): btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread
> failed -30
Of course it's extent tree corrupted.
>
> and a subsequent mount without the userbackuproot fails in the same way
> as before.
>
> I have a copy of the important directories, but would like to be able to
> repair the filesystem if possible,
You could mostly salvage the data, either use 'usebackuproot' mount
option + RO mount or btrfs-restore.
For full rw recovery, I don't think there is a good tool right now.
Extent tree repair is pretty trikcy, under most case, the only method is
--init-extent-tree, but that functionality isn't tried by many users.
And it only makes sense if all other trees are OK.
So in short, RW recovery is near impossible.
>
> Any advise around repairing the filesystem would be appreciated.
It's better to salvage your data first and if you like adventure, try
--init-extent-tree.
If not, just rebuild the array.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thanks.
>
> Roderick Johnstone
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 10:24 Broken filesystem Roderick Johnstone
2019-02-19 12:34 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-02-19 12:42 ` Roderick Johnstone
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-25 11:34 Broken Filesystem Hendrik Friedel
2020-01-25 12:20 ` Qu Wenruo
[not found] ` <emeee471c5-e6f0-4503-8410-742b05f87305@ryzen>
2020-01-25 13:36 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-25 15:22 ` Hugo Mills
2020-01-25 19:46 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d7012d4-0274-aa8b-1a49-9c269f3cfdf1@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmj@ast.cam.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).