linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
@ 2023-09-20 21:51 Anand Jain
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-20 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Anand Jain

v2: Splits the patch into two parts: one for the new code to reject
devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2 and the second to remove the unused code.

The btrfs-progs code to reunite devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
which is ported from the kernel, can be found in the following btrfs-progs
patchset:

 [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
    btrfs-progs: tune use the latest bdev in fs_devices for super_copy
    btrfs-progs: add support to fix superblock with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
    btrfs-progs: recover from the failed btrfstune -m|M
    btrfs-progs: test btrfstune -m|M ability to fix previous failures

Furthermore, when the kernel stops supporting the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
we will need to update the btrfs-progs test case accordingly:

    btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034-metadata-uuid remove kernel support

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02d59bdd7a8b778deb17e300354558498db59376.1692178060.git.anand.jain@oracle.com


Anand Jain (2):
  btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
  btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag

 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |  10 ---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 166 ++++-----------------------------------------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |   1 -
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)

-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
  2023-09-20 21:51 [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
@ 2023-09-20 21:51 ` Anand Jain
  2023-09-22 11:23   ` David Sterba
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
  2023-09-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with " David Sterba
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-20 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Anand Jain

The BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag indicates a transient state
where the device in the userspace btrfstune -m|-M operation failed to
complete changing the fsid.

This flag makes the kernel to automatically determine the other
partner devices to which a given device can be associated, based on the
fsid, metadata_uuid and generation values.

btrfstune -m|M feature is especially useful in virtual cloud setups, where
compute instances (disk images) are quickly copied, fsid changed, and
launched. Given numerous disk images with the same metadata_uuid but
different fsid, there's no clear way a device can be correctly assembled
with the proper partners when the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set. So, the
disk could be assembled incorrectly, as in the example below:

Before this patch:

Consider the following two filesystems:
   /dev/loop[2-3] are raw copies of /dev/loop[0-1] and the btrsftune -m
operation fails.

In this scenario, as the /dev/loop0's fsid change is interrupted, and the
CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set as shown below.

  $ p="device|devid|^metadata_uuid|^fsid|^incom|^generation|^flags"

  $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop0 | egrep '$p'
  superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop0
  flags			0x1000000001
  fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
  metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
  generation		9
  num_devices		2
  incompat_flags	0x741
  dev_item.devid	1

  $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop1 | egrep '$p'
  superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop1
  flags			0x1
  fsid			11d2af4d-1b71-45a9-83f6-f2100766939d
  metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
  generation		10
  num_devices		2
  incompat_flags	0x741
  dev_item.devid	2

  $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop2 | egrep '$p'
  superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop2
  flags			0x1
  fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
  metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
  generation		8
  num_devices		2
  incompat_flags	0x741
  dev_item.devid	1

  $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop3 | egrep '$p'
  superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop3
  flags			0x1
  fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
  metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
  generation		8
  num_devices		2
  incompat_flags	0x741
  dev_item.devid	2

It is normal that some devices aren't instantly discovered during
system boot or iSCSI discovery. The controlled scan below demonstrates
this.

  $ btrfs device scan --forget
  $ btrfs device scan /dev/loop0
  Scanning for btrfs filesystems on '/dev/loop0'
  $ mount /dev/loop3 /btrfs
  $ btrfs filesystem show -m
  Label: none  uuid: 7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
	Total devices 2 FS bytes used 144.00KiB
	devid    1 size 300.00MiB used 48.00MiB path /dev/loop0
	devid    2 size 300.00MiB used 40.00MiB path /dev/loop3

/dev/loop0 and /dev/loop3 are incorrectly partnered.

This kernel patch removes functions and code connected to the
CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag.

With this patch, now devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag are rejected.
And its partner will fail to mount with the extra -o degraded option.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
Moreover, a btrfs-progs patch (below) has eliminated the use of the
CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag entirely:

   [PATCH] btrfs-progs: btrfstune -m|M remove 2-stage commit

And we solve the compatability concerns as below:

  New-kernel new-progs - has no CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag.
  Old-kernel new-progs - has no CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag, kernel code unused.
  Old-kernel old-progs - bug may occur.
  New-kernel old-progs - Should use host with the newer btrfs-progs to fix.

For legacy systems to help fix such a condition in the userspace instead
we have the below patchset which ports of kernel's CHANGING_FSID_V2 code.

   [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel

And if it couldn't fix in some cases, users can use manually reunite,
with the patchset:

   [PATCH 00/10] btrfs-progs: check and tune: add device and noscan options

 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 ----------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index dc577b3c53f6..95746ddf7dc3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3173,7 +3173,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
 	u32 nodesize;
 	u32 stripesize;
 	u64 generation;
-	u64 features;
 	u16 csum_type;
 	struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb);
@@ -3255,15 +3254,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
 
 	disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
 
-
-	features = btrfs_super_flags(disk_super);
-	if (features & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2) {
-		features &= ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2;
-		btrfs_set_super_flags(disk_super, features);
-		btrfs_info(fs_info,
-			"found metadata UUID change in progress flag, clearing");
-	}
-
 	memcpy(fs_info->super_for_commit, fs_info->super_copy,
 	       sizeof(*fs_info->super_for_commit));
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index bc8d46cbc7c5..c845c60ec207 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -791,6 +791,13 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
 	bool fsid_change_in_progress = (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
 					BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2);
 
+	if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
+		btrfs_err(NULL,
+"device %s has incomplete FSID changes please use btrfstune to complete",
+			  path);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
 	error = lookup_bdev(path, &path_devt);
 	if (error) {
 		btrfs_err(NULL, "failed to lookup block device for path %s: %d",
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
  2023-09-20 21:51 [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
@ 2023-09-20 21:51 ` Anand Jain
  2023-09-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with " David Sterba
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-20 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Anand Jain

The commit ("btrfs: reject devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2") has stopped
the assembly of devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag in the kernel.
Remove the related unused code.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 161 ++-------------------------------------------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |   1 -
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index c845c60ec207..8ebd1427a6f3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -455,58 +455,6 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid(
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-/*
- * First check if the metadata_uuid is different from the fsid in the given
- * fs_devices. Then check if the given fsid is the same as the metadata_uuid
- * in the fs_devices. If it is, return true; otherwise, return false.
- */
-static inline bool check_fsid_changed(const struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
-				      const u8 *fsid)
-{
-	return memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
-		      BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0 &&
-	       memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0;
-}
-
-static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid(
-				struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
-{
-
-	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
-
-	/*
-	 * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
-	 * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by first scanning
-	 * a device which didn't have its fsid/metadata_uuid changed
-	 * at all and the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
-		if (!fs_devices->fsid_change)
-			continue;
-
-		if (match_fsid_fs_devices(fs_devices, disk_super->metadata_uuid,
-					  fs_devices->fsid))
-			return fs_devices;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Handle scanned device having completed its fsid change but
-	 * belonging to a fs_devices that was created by a device that
-	 * has an outdated pair of fsid/metadata_uuid and
-	 * CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
-		if (!fs_devices->fsid_change)
-			continue;
-
-		if (check_fsid_changed(fs_devices, disk_super->metadata_uuid))
-			return fs_devices;
-	}
-
-	return find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, disk_super->metadata_uuid);
-}
-
-
 static int
 btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(const char *device_path, blk_mode_t flags, void *holder,
 		      int flush, struct block_device **bdev,
@@ -690,84 +638,6 @@ u8 *btrfs_sb_fsid_ptr(struct btrfs_super_block *sb)
 	return has_metadata_uuid ? sb->metadata_uuid : sb->fsid;
 }
 
-/*
- * Handle scanned device having its CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag set and the fs_devices
- * being created with a disk that has already completed its fsid change. Such
- * disk can belong to an fs which has its FSID changed or to one which doesn't.
- * Handle both cases here.
- */
-static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_inprogress(
-					struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
-{
-	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
-		if (fs_devices->fsid_change)
-			continue;
-
-		if (check_fsid_changed(fs_devices,  disk_super->fsid))
-			return fs_devices;
-	}
-
-	return find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, NULL);
-}
-
-static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_changed(
-					struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
-{
-	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
-
-	/*
-	 * Handles the case where scanned device is part of an fs that had
-	 * multiple successful changes of FSID but currently device didn't
-	 * observe it. Meaning our fsid will be different than theirs. We need
-	 * to handle two subcases :
-	 *  1 - The fs still continues to have different METADATA/FSID uuids.
-	 *  2 - The fs is switched back to its original FSID (METADATA/FSID
-	 *  are equal).
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
-		/* Changed UUIDs */
-		if (check_fsid_changed(fs_devices, disk_super->metadata_uuid) &&
-		    memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, disk_super->fsid,
-			   BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0)
-			return fs_devices;
-
-		/* Unchanged UUIDs */
-		if (memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid,
-			   BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 &&
-		    memcmp(fs_devices->fsid, disk_super->metadata_uuid,
-			   BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0)
-			return fs_devices;
-	}
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
-static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_reverted_metadata(
-				struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
-{
-	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
-
-	/*
-	 * Handle the case where the scanned device is part of an fs whose last
-	 * metadata UUID change reverted it to the original FSID. At the same
-	 * time fs_devices was first created by another constituent device
-	 * which didn't fully observe the operation. This results in an
-	 * btrfs_fs_devices created with metadata/fsid different AND
-	 * btrfs_fs_devices::fsid_change set AND the metadata_uuid of the
-	 * fs_devices equal to the FSID of the disk.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, fs_list) {
-		if (!fs_devices->fsid_change)
-			continue;
-
-		if (check_fsid_changed(fs_devices, disk_super->fsid))
-			return fs_devices;
-	}
-
-	return NULL;
-}
 /*
  * Add new device to list of registered devices
  *
@@ -788,10 +658,9 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
 	int error;
 	bool has_metadata_uuid = (btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super) &
 		BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID);
-	bool fsid_change_in_progress = (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
-					BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2);
 
-	if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
+	if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
+	    BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2) {
 		btrfs_err(NULL,
 "device %s has incomplete FSID changes please use btrfstune to complete",
 			  path);
@@ -805,20 +674,13 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
 		return ERR_PTR(error);
 	}
 
-	if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
-		if (!has_metadata_uuid)
-			fs_devices = find_fsid_inprogress(disk_super);
-		else
-			fs_devices = find_fsid_changed(disk_super);
-	} else if (has_metadata_uuid) {
-		fs_devices = find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid(disk_super);
+	if (has_metadata_uuid) {
+		fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid,
+				       disk_super->metadata_uuid);
 	} else {
-		fs_devices = find_fsid_reverted_metadata(disk_super);
-		if (!fs_devices)
-			fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, NULL);
+		fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, NULL);
 	}
 
-
 	if (!fs_devices) {
 		fs_devices = alloc_fs_devices(disk_super->fsid);
 		if (has_metadata_uuid)
@@ -828,8 +690,6 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
 		if (IS_ERR(fs_devices))
 			return ERR_CAST(fs_devices);
 
-		fs_devices->fsid_change = fsid_change_in_progress;
-
 		mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 		list_add(&fs_devices->fs_list, &fs_uuids);
 
@@ -843,18 +703,11 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
 		mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 		device = btrfs_find_device(fs_devices, &args);
 
-		/*
-		 * If this disk has been pulled into an fs devices created by
-		 * a device which had the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag then replace the
-		 * metadata_uuid/fsid values of the fs_devices.
-		 */
-		if (fs_devices->fsid_change &&
-		    found_transid > fs_devices->latest_generation) {
+		if (found_transid > fs_devices->latest_generation) {
 			memcpy(fs_devices->fsid, disk_super->fsid,
 					BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
 			memcpy(fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
 			       btrfs_sb_fsid_ptr(disk_super), BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
-			fs_devices->fsid_change = false;
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index a0e76bb20140..e485e6a3e52c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -362,7 +362,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_devices {
 	bool rotating;
 	/* Devices support TRIM/discard commands. */
 	bool discardable;
-	bool fsid_change;
 	/* The filesystem is a seed filesystem. */
 	bool seeding;
 
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
@ 2023-09-22 11:23   ` David Sterba
  2023-09-22 12:40     ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2023-09-22 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:51:13AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> The BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag indicates a transient state
> where the device in the userspace btrfstune -m|-M operation failed to
> complete changing the fsid.
> 
> This flag makes the kernel to automatically determine the other
> partner devices to which a given device can be associated, based on the
> fsid, metadata_uuid and generation values.
> 
> btrfstune -m|M feature is especially useful in virtual cloud setups, where
> compute instances (disk images) are quickly copied, fsid changed, and
> launched. Given numerous disk images with the same metadata_uuid but
> different fsid, there's no clear way a device can be correctly assembled
> with the proper partners when the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set. So, the
> disk could be assembled incorrectly, as in the example below:
> 
> Before this patch:
> 
> Consider the following two filesystems:
>    /dev/loop[2-3] are raw copies of /dev/loop[0-1] and the btrsftune -m
> operation fails.
> 
> In this scenario, as the /dev/loop0's fsid change is interrupted, and the
> CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag is set as shown below.
> 
>   $ p="device|devid|^metadata_uuid|^fsid|^incom|^generation|^flags"
> 
>   $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop0 | egrep '$p'
>   superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop0
>   flags			0x1000000001
>   fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>   metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>   generation		9
>   num_devices		2
>   incompat_flags	0x741
>   dev_item.devid	1
> 
>   $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop1 | egrep '$p'
>   superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop1
>   flags			0x1
>   fsid			11d2af4d-1b71-45a9-83f6-f2100766939d
>   metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>   generation		10
>   num_devices		2
>   incompat_flags	0x741
>   dev_item.devid	2
> 
>   $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop2 | egrep '$p'
>   superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop2
>   flags			0x1
>   fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>   metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>   generation		8
>   num_devices		2
>   incompat_flags	0x741
>   dev_item.devid	1
> 
>   $ btrfs inspect dump-super /dev/loop3 | egrep '$p'
>   superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/loop3
>   flags			0x1
>   fsid			7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
>   metadata_uuid		bb040a9f-233a-4de2-ad84-49aa5a28059b
>   generation		8
>   num_devices		2
>   incompat_flags	0x741
>   dev_item.devid	2
> 
> It is normal that some devices aren't instantly discovered during
> system boot or iSCSI discovery. The controlled scan below demonstrates
> this.
> 
>   $ btrfs device scan --forget
>   $ btrfs device scan /dev/loop0
>   Scanning for btrfs filesystems on '/dev/loop0'
>   $ mount /dev/loop3 /btrfs
>   $ btrfs filesystem show -m
>   Label: none  uuid: 7d4b4b93-2b27-4432-b4e4-4be1fbccbd45
> 	Total devices 2 FS bytes used 144.00KiB
> 	devid    1 size 300.00MiB used 48.00MiB path /dev/loop0
> 	devid    2 size 300.00MiB used 40.00MiB path /dev/loop3
> 
> /dev/loop0 and /dev/loop3 are incorrectly partnered.
> 
> This kernel patch removes functions and code connected to the
> CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag.
> 
> With this patch, now devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag are rejected.
> And its partner will fail to mount with the extra -o degraded option.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> Moreover, a btrfs-progs patch (below) has eliminated the use of the
> CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag entirely:
> 
>    [PATCH] btrfs-progs: btrfstune -m|M remove 2-stage commit
> 
> And we solve the compatability concerns as below:
> 
>   New-kernel new-progs - has no CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag.
>   Old-kernel new-progs - has no CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag, kernel code unused.
>   Old-kernel old-progs - bug may occur.
>   New-kernel old-progs - Should use host with the newer btrfs-progs to fix.
> 
> For legacy systems to help fix such a condition in the userspace instead
> we have the below patchset which ports of kernel's CHANGING_FSID_V2 code.
> 
>    [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
> 
> And if it couldn't fix in some cases, users can use manually reunite,
> with the patchset:
> 
>    [PATCH 00/10] btrfs-progs: check and tune: add device and noscan options
> 
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 ----------
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index dc577b3c53f6..95746ddf7dc3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3173,7 +3173,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>  	u32 nodesize;
>  	u32 stripesize;
>  	u64 generation;
> -	u64 features;
>  	u16 csum_type;
>  	struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
>  	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb);
> @@ -3255,15 +3254,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>  
>  	disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
>  
> -
> -	features = btrfs_super_flags(disk_super);
> -	if (features & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2) {
> -		features &= ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2;
> -		btrfs_set_super_flags(disk_super, features);
> -		btrfs_info(fs_info,
> -			"found metadata UUID change in progress flag, clearing");
> -	}

This is removed from the mount path but it's still rejected because at
some point the device scanning will be called and will return -EINVAL.

> -
>  	memcpy(fs_info->super_for_commit, fs_info->super_copy,
>  	       sizeof(*fs_info->super_for_commit));
>  
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index bc8d46cbc7c5..c845c60ec207 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,13 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
>  	bool fsid_change_in_progress = (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
>  					BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2);
>  
> +	if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
> +		btrfs_err(NULL,
> +"device %s has incomplete FSID changes please use btrfstune to complete",

This could say it's specifically metadata_uuid.

> +			  path);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

We could probably return -EAGAIN as it's not a hard error.

Please let me know if you agree with the changes, I'll fix it in the
commit.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
  2023-09-22 11:23   ` David Sterba
@ 2023-09-22 12:40     ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-22 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs


>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index dc577b3c53f6..95746ddf7dc3 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -3173,7 +3173,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>>   	u32 nodesize;
>>   	u32 stripesize;
>>   	u64 generation;
>> -	u64 features;
>>   	u16 csum_type;
>>   	struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
>>   	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb);
>> @@ -3255,15 +3254,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>>   
>>   	disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
>>   
>> -
>> -	features = btrfs_super_flags(disk_super);
>> -	if (features & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2) {
>> -		features &= ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2;
>> -		btrfs_set_super_flags(disk_super, features);
>> -		btrfs_info(fs_info,
>> -			"found metadata UUID change in progress flag, clearing");
>> -	}
> 
> This is removed from the mount path but it's still rejected because at
> some point the device scanning will be called and will return -EINVAL.
> 

Correct. This mount thread calls btrfs_scan_one_device() with the 
mounting device as the path and verifies its superblock until it reaches 
device_list_add(), where we return -EINVAL.


>> -
>>   	memcpy(fs_info->super_for_commit, fs_info->super_copy,
>>   	       sizeof(*fs_info->super_for_commit));
>>   
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index bc8d46cbc7c5..c845c60ec207 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -791,6 +791,13 @@ static noinline struct btrfs_device *device_list_add(const char *path,
>>   	bool fsid_change_in_progress = (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
>>   					BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2);
>>   
>> +	if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
>> +		btrfs_err(NULL,
>> +"device %s has incomplete FSID changes please use btrfstune to complete",
> 
> This could say it's specifically metadata_uuid.
> 
>> +			  path);
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Here.

> 
> We could probably return -EAGAIN as it's not a hard error.
> 

-EAGAIN is fine.

> Please let me know if you agree with the changes, I'll fix it in the
> commit.

Thanks!
Anand

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
  2023-09-20 21:51 [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
  2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
@ 2023-09-25 16:58 ` David Sterba
  2023-09-25 23:56   ` Anand Jain
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2023-09-25 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:51:12AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> v2: Splits the patch into two parts: one for the new code to reject
> devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2 and the second to remove the unused code.
> 
> The btrfs-progs code to reunite devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
> which is ported from the kernel, can be found in the following btrfs-progs
> patchset:
> 
>  [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
>     btrfs-progs: tune use the latest bdev in fs_devices for super_copy
>     btrfs-progs: add support to fix superblock with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
>     btrfs-progs: recover from the failed btrfstune -m|M
>     btrfs-progs: test btrfstune -m|M ability to fix previous failures
> 
> Furthermore, when the kernel stops supporting the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
> we will need to update the btrfs-progs test case accordingly:
> 
>     btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034-metadata-uuid remove kernel support
> 
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02d59bdd7a8b778deb17e300354558498db59376.1692178060.git.anand.jain@oracle.com
> 
> 
> Anand Jain (2):
>   btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
>   btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag

Added to misc-next, thanks. I've updated the 2nd patch with some
historical background. The temp-fsid patch now does not apply cleanly,
I'll do a refresh on top of this series. Once it's in for-next, please
have a look. Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
  2023-09-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with " David Sterba
@ 2023-09-25 23:56   ` Anand Jain
  2023-09-27 17:43     ` David Sterba
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-25 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs



On 26/09/2023 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:51:12AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> v2: Splits the patch into two parts: one for the new code to reject
>> devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2 and the second to remove the unused code.
>>
>> The btrfs-progs code to reunite devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
>> which is ported from the kernel, can be found in the following btrfs-progs
>> patchset:
>>
>>   [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
>>      btrfs-progs: tune use the latest bdev in fs_devices for super_copy
>>      btrfs-progs: add support to fix superblock with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
>>      btrfs-progs: recover from the failed btrfstune -m|M
>>      btrfs-progs: test btrfstune -m|M ability to fix previous failures
>>
>> Furthermore, when the kernel stops supporting the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
>> we will need to update the btrfs-progs test case accordingly:
>>
>>      btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034-metadata-uuid remove kernel support
>>
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02d59bdd7a8b778deb17e300354558498db59376.1692178060.git.anand.jain@oracle.com
>>
>>
>> Anand Jain (2):
>>    btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
>>    btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
> 


> Added to misc-next, thanks.

> I've updated the 2nd patch with some
> historical background.

Now much more complete! Thanks.

> The temp-fsid patch now does not apply cleanly,
> I'll do a refresh on top of this series. Once it's in for-next, please
> have a look. Thanks.

Sure. But, temp-fsid v4 still has a subvol mount bug, as reported
before. I have a fix that is in-memory only. I am trying to get a
reasonable list of fstests passed before sending it out. Guilherme
can add the super-block flag on top of this, although it is not
mandatory from the btrfs internals pov. I will send out the
in-memory based temp-fsid soon I get the fstests (with some fix)
working today.

Thanks, Anand

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
  2023-09-25 23:56   ` Anand Jain
@ 2023-09-27 17:43     ` David Sterba
  2023-09-28  1:25       ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2023-09-27 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: dsterba, linux-btrfs

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 07:56:57AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 26/09/2023 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:51:12AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> >> v2: Splits the patch into two parts: one for the new code to reject
> >> devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2 and the second to remove the unused code.
> >>
> >> The btrfs-progs code to reunite devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
> >> which is ported from the kernel, can be found in the following btrfs-progs
> >> patchset:
> >>
> >>   [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
> >>      btrfs-progs: tune use the latest bdev in fs_devices for super_copy
> >>      btrfs-progs: add support to fix superblock with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
> >>      btrfs-progs: recover from the failed btrfstune -m|M
> >>      btrfs-progs: test btrfstune -m|M ability to fix previous failures
> >>
> >> Furthermore, when the kernel stops supporting the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
> >> we will need to update the btrfs-progs test case accordingly:
> >>
> >>      btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034-metadata-uuid remove kernel support
> >>
> >> v1:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02d59bdd7a8b778deb17e300354558498db59376.1692178060.git.anand.jain@oracle.com
> >>
> >>
> >> Anand Jain (2):
> >>    btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
> >>    btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
> > 
> 
> 
> > Added to misc-next, thanks.
> 
> > I've updated the 2nd patch with some
> > historical background.
> 
> Now much more complete! Thanks.
> 
> > The temp-fsid patch now does not apply cleanly,
> > I'll do a refresh on top of this series. Once it's in for-next, please
> > have a look. Thanks.
> 
> Sure. But, temp-fsid v4 still has a subvol mount bug, as reported
> before. I have a fix that is in-memory only. I am trying to get a
> reasonable list of fstests passed before sending it out. Guilherme
> can add the super-block flag on top of this, although it is not
> mandatory from the btrfs internals pov. I will send out the
> in-memory based temp-fsid soon I get the fstests (with some fix)
> working today.

Feel free the send the patches even if there are still failing tests,
I'd like to get an idea of how are you fixing the remaining problem(s).
Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
  2023-09-27 17:43     ` David Sterba
@ 2023-09-28  1:25       ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-28  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs



On 28/09/2023 01:43, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 07:56:57AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> On 26/09/2023 00:58, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:51:12AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>>> v2: Splits the patch into two parts: one for the new code to reject
>>>> devices with CHANGING_FSID_V2 and the second to remove the unused code.
>>>>
>>>> The btrfs-progs code to reunite devices with the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
>>>> which is ported from the kernel, can be found in the following btrfs-progs
>>>> patchset:
>>>>
>>>>    [PATCH 0/4 v4] btrfs-progs: recover from failed metadata_uuid port kernel
>>>>       btrfs-progs: tune use the latest bdev in fs_devices for super_copy
>>>>       btrfs-progs: add support to fix superblock with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
>>>>       btrfs-progs: recover from the failed btrfstune -m|M
>>>>       btrfs-progs: test btrfstune -m|M ability to fix previous failures
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore, when the kernel stops supporting the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag,
>>>> we will need to update the btrfs-progs test case accordingly:
>>>>
>>>>       btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034-metadata-uuid remove kernel support
>>>>
>>>> v1:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02d59bdd7a8b778deb17e300354558498db59376.1692178060.git.anand.jain@oracle.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anand Jain (2):
>>>>     btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2
>>>>     btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Added to misc-next, thanks.
>>
>>> I've updated the 2nd patch with some
>>> historical background.
>>
>> Now much more complete! Thanks.
>>
>>> The temp-fsid patch now does not apply cleanly,
>>> I'll do a refresh on top of this series. Once it's in for-next, please
>>> have a look. Thanks.
>>
>> Sure. But, temp-fsid v4 still has a subvol mount bug, as reported
>> before. I have a fix that is in-memory only. I am trying to get a
>> reasonable list of fstests passed before sending it out. Guilherme
>> can add the super-block flag on top of this, although it is not
>> mandatory from the btrfs internals pov. I will send out the
>> in-memory based temp-fsid soon I get the fstests (with some fix)
>> working today.
> 
> Feel free the send the patches even if there are still failing tests,
> I'd like to get an idea of how are you fixing the remaining problem(s).
> Thanks.

Yep, it is almost ready. A few minor cleanups and code optimizations
are still due. However, I have sent them for the review comments.
Below are the patches in the mailing list now. Also, after sending
them, I realized it would have been easier for the searches if the
subject included 'temp-fsid' instead of 'cloned-device'

  [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability

  [PATCH 0/2] btrfs-progs: mkfs: testing cloned-device


Thanks, Anand



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-28  1:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-20 21:51 [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: reject device with CHANGING_FSID_V2 Anand Jain
2023-09-22 11:23   ` David Sterba
2023-09-22 12:40     ` Anand Jain
2023-09-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: remove unused code related to the CHANGING_FSID_V2 flag Anand Jain
2023-09-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] btrfs: reject device with " David Sterba
2023-09-25 23:56   ` Anand Jain
2023-09-27 17:43     ` David Sterba
2023-09-28  1:25       ` Anand Jain

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).