From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: New data=ordered code pushed out to btrfs-unstable Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:32:21 -0400 Message-ID: <1216560741.6932.83.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> References: <1216398992.6932.36.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <4880F87B.7020908@gmail.com> <1216411969.6932.70.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <48811ABF.5010606@gmail.com> <1216428331.6932.82.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <48832D42.6030204@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-btrfs To: rwheeler@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48832D42.6030204@redhat.com> List-ID: On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > Chris Mason wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > > > >> Chris Mason wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on > >>>> ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million > >>>> files or so and restart. > >>>> > > > > Well, it looks like I neglected to push all the changesets, especially > > the last one that made it less racey. So, I've just done another push, > > sorry. For the fs_mark workload, it shouldn't change anything. > > > > This code still hasn't really survived an overnight run, hopefully this > > commit will. > > > > -chris > > > > > > > The test is still running, but slowly, with a (slow) stream of messages > about: > Could you please grab the sysrq-w if this is still running? -chris