From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS support for btrfs - v2
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:33:49 +0100
Message-ID: <1219088029.3184.413.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
References: <200807210201.56690.balajirrao@gmail.com>
	 <200808171821.43874.balajirrao@gmail.com>
	 <1218977763.3184.288.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
	 <200808171854.14275.balajirrao@gmail.com>
	 <1218980439.3184.304.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
	 <1219087412.14063.22.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1219087412.14063.22.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 15:23 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> The search key in Yan's patch changes to (u64)-1.  We know that if
> we're in slot 0, there's nothing after us in the tree.

But because we searched for a reference to (u64)-1, the item we want is
actually _earlier_ in the tree, not later.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation