From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: btrfs day 1
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:47:48 -0400
Message-ID: <1219240068.24481.26.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
References: <20080814001120.4f1fea7a@speedy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080814001120.4f1fea7a@speedy>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 00:11 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Setup new 60G home partition on laptop as a real life test of 0.16.
> Using Ubuntu standard kernel 2.6.24-19-generic on i386
> 
> I notice that during normal (busy time) everything seems fine, but after going away
> for a while and coming back, it seems sluggish. Lots of errors in log:
> 
>  btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4583424 csum 3821684403 private 0
>  btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4579328 csum 3233603900 private 0
>  btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4575232 csum 306171610 private 0
> 
> Maybe it isn't handleing spindown properly? or something like that?

Hi,

I think the btrfs-unstable tree should have fixes for all of this.  I
know you had moved back to ext3 for now, but just wanted to follow up.

-chris