From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Anopolsky <erpo41@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Btrfs conf call
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:03:31 -0600
Message-ID: <1221595411.7738.0.camel@telesto>
References: <1221060558.29741.104.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
	 <loom.20080916T190349-546@post.gmane.org>
	 <c24352ca0809161231j1c68bd3dk16b8f86cfa05c661@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-e42KPz7iiIvlQYTQ+ndj"
Cc: jj <jj@mailinator.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: jeffschroeder@computer.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <c24352ca0809161231j1c68bd3dk16b8f86cfa05c661@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>


--=-e42KPz7iiIvlQYTQ+ndj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:31 -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:05 PM, jj <jj@mailinator.com> wrote:
> > Chris Mason <chris.mason <at> oracle.com> writes:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Our regular bi-weekly btrfs conf call will be today (Wednesday):
> > ...
> >> The agenda will cover status updates on the synchronous operations cod=
e,
> >> Yan's new backref work and Josef's allocator changes.
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has a re-cap of the meeting?
>=20
> Would a recording of the conference call posted on the website be
> unreasonable to ask for? If people want to know these sorts of things
> but can't make the call perhaps it would save everyone time.
>=20

I would really like that.

Cheers,
Eric


--=-e42KPz7iiIvlQYTQ+ndj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBI0BETe2L37HVup3ARAh8sAKDkwp84CeP6pEVR++AygSpQf6dLzACZAWyB
6xDUl1o+IV6Yt4+4Tjm2NqM=
=F93Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-e42KPz7iiIvlQYTQ+ndj--