Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Anopolsky <erpo41@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
	Zheng Yan <zheng.yan@oracle.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: snapshot merging?
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:54:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222246456.26395.16.camel@telesto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809232034.21750.phillips@phunq.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 20:34 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 21 September 2008 07:31, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > > Writeable snapshot has been available in btrfs for a long time.
> > 
> > Writeable snapshots and snapshot merging are two different things.
> 
> I think what Mikulas really means by "snapshot merging" is what we call
> "revert to snapshot" in ddsnap (google Zumastor ddsnap).  The latter is
> more appropriate terminology IMHO.  For a snapshotted volume, this just
> requires copying any blocks that belong to the snapshot and not the
> origin back to the origin.  Similarly, one could revert any snapshot
> "back" (quotes because there is not necessarily any relationship in
> time) to any other.  For a filesystem it will not be nearly so simple,
> because at best only part of the job can be done at the physical block
> level.

It took me a while to get what was meant by snapshot merging. Consider
this a vote for the "revert" terminology. :) Although, it calls into
question some of my assumptions about what people use snapshots for.

What do people use snapshots for?

Cheers,
Eric


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-24  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-21 12:22 snapshot merging? Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-09-21 14:19 ` Zheng Yan
2008-09-21 14:31   ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-09-21 15:00     ` Zheng Yan
2008-09-24  3:34     ` Daniel Phillips
2008-09-24  8:54       ` Eric Anopolsky [this message]
2008-09-24 10:27         ` Tomasz Torcz
2008-09-24 12:57       ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222246456.26395.16.camel@telesto \
    --to=erpo41@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    --cc=phillips@phunq.net \
    --cc=zheng.yan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox