From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Notes on support for multiple devices for a single filesystem Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:26:24 -0500 Message-ID: <1229549184.27170.88.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> References: <1227183484.6161.17.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1228962896.21376.11.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20081211141436.030c2d65.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081210200604.8e190b0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1229006596.22236.46.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20081215210323.GB5000@webber.adilger.int> <20081217132343.GA14695@infradead.org> <20081217115325.3312858a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1229547485.27170.77.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , adilger@sun.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Kay Sievers Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 22:20 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 21:58, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > There are other bits and pieces like high speed front end caching > > devices that would be difficult in MD/LVM, but since I don't have that > > coded yet I suppose they don't really count... > > Features like the very nice and useful directory-based snapshots would > also not be possible with simple block-based multi-devices, right? At least for btrfs, the snapshotting is independent from the multi-device code, and you still get snapshotting on single device filesystems. -chris